On Sat, 2013-12-14 at 06:56 -0800, Dylan Baker wrote:
> On Friday, December 13, 2013 10:21:20 PM Brian Dolbec wrote:
> > On Fri, 2013-12-13 at 21:14 -0800, Matt Turner wrote:
> > > On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 7:07 PM, Brian Dolbec <dolsen@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > > > -                       print "Using command line specified Catalyst
> > > > configuration file, "+myconfig +                       print "Using
> > > > command line specified Catalyst configuration file, "+\> 
> > > No need to add \
> > > 
> > > (same comment applies elsewhere)
> > 
> > General rule is if you are making something multiline, it needs to be
> > enclosed in ()'s or []'s, etc..  I'm quite certain that the old print
> > statement needs the line continuation "\" symbol since there are no ()'s
> > enclosing all blocks to be printed.  That may have changed at some point
> > so that it is not required in more recent python versions.  Actually
> > when using the newer python()  you don't even need to use + between
> > blocks of text on multiple lines.
> 
> You are perfectly free to use () with the print keyword in python 2.x

That is also a py3 compatibility change.  So I WAS trying to keep that
separate and done after the main mess was cleaned up.


{and can everyone try to do list replies only, we don't need multiple
copies of the same mail}