From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C74D213827E for ; Sat, 14 Dec 2013 16:03:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8214AE0AA9; Sat, 14 Dec 2013 16:03:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 134CAE0AA9 for ; Sat, 14 Dec 2013 16:03:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.210] (S010600222de111ff.vc.shawcable.net [96.49.5.156]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: dolsen) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 21F6233F52C for ; Sat, 14 Dec 2013 16:03:02 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1387036970.3897.152.camel@big_daddy.dol-sen.ca> Subject: Re: [gentoo-catalyst] [PATCH 4/4] cleanup long lines, improve usage() output formatting slightly From: Brian Dolbec To: gentoo-catalyst@lists.gentoo.org Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2013 08:02:50 -0800 In-Reply-To: <26676850.7S5LYTqhiB@moiraine> References: <1386990436-9198-1-git-send-email-dolsen@gentoo.org> <1387002080.3897.110.camel@big_daddy.dol-sen.ca> <26676850.7S5LYTqhiB@moiraine> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-RuJtM5vTLtA3eQyot8W5" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.6.4 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-catalyst@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-catalyst@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Archives-Salt: 1971adac-6ed2-4be1-894d-7405a187f57d X-Archives-Hash: c5bc75c0427e043f8eb7416067c632ba --=-RuJtM5vTLtA3eQyot8W5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 2013-12-14 at 06:56 -0800, Dylan Baker wrote: > On Friday, December 13, 2013 10:21:20 PM Brian Dolbec wrote: > > On Fri, 2013-12-13 at 21:14 -0800, Matt Turner wrote: > > > On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 7:07 PM, Brian Dolbec wro= te: > > > > - print "Using command line specified Catalys= t > > > > configuration file, "+myconfig + print "Using > > > > command line specified Catalyst configuration file, "+\>=20 > > > No need to add \ > > >=20 > > > (same comment applies elsewhere) > >=20 > > General rule is if you are making something multiline, it needs to be > > enclosed in ()'s or []'s, etc.. I'm quite certain that the old print > > statement needs the line continuation "\" symbol since there are no ()'= s > > enclosing all blocks to be printed. That may have changed at some poin= t > > so that it is not required in more recent python versions. Actually > > when using the newer python() you don't even need to use + between > > blocks of text on multiple lines. >=20 > You are perfectly free to use () with the print keyword in python 2.x That is also a py3 compatibility change. So I WAS trying to keep that separate and done after the main mess was cleaned up. {and can everyone try to do list replies only, we don't need multiple copies of the same mail} --=-RuJtM5vTLtA3eQyot8W5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQF8BAABCgBmBQJSrIEqXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ4Njg4RkQxQ0M3MUMxQzA0RUFFQTQyMzcy MjE0RDkwQTAxNEYxN0NCAAoJECIU2QoBTxfL680H/3gfPHb0FNJXKxKU5l7oIJf4 9UVP8rsK7lNy+0S8mTtT/3LCobgeNkw4s7wkNgZqbzRQFO9xBchk/+cOrSXu9I90 uPWFp+nZ9vfsowzIYIkMz6rZ6zKML0WYLwjNgNYuv2CR62jz/P026emqlDX3fqkF PyMt51pHhGIk78EIUoOM6CLCPAdxbZwjZMcXj7+HrFOFYA4vStMkjZkUFYthT5Xp T1pSxpDwY4PWQ41NMl/oDFyGy6BUZhUzmhWYMynD7hgqmnKpFL9LI0nt7+KcPr8w vzEvlXiju5GSX92arcL/XOVOkyZj6adRvYJDit0ILcYoxB19qyx4Eb1ma3dm1+k= =E0oY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-RuJtM5vTLtA3eQyot8W5--