From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MyUTO-0005Jp-G2 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 15 Oct 2009 17:50:46 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D8EBCE07F7; Thu, 15 Oct 2009 17:50:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE2C9E07F7 for ; Thu, 15 Oct 2009 17:50:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vapier.localnet (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEE66B52AB for ; Thu, 15 Oct 2009 17:50:41 +0000 (UTC) From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-catalyst@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-catalyst] Too many problems with groupadd when creating stage3 Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 13:50:40 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.1 (Linux/2.6.31; KDE/4.3.1; x86_64; ; ) References: <200910151330.14644.vapier@gentoo.org> <20091015174516.24167.qmail@stuge.se> In-Reply-To: <20091015174516.24167.qmail@stuge.se> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-catalyst@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-catalyst@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1608773.941usaYVra"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200910151350.40998.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 173792f8-e28b-476f-91dd-c4565e98a79d X-Archives-Hash: 289a80446ed16c669365caa1d786de11 --nextPart1608773.941usaYVra Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thursday 15 October 2009 13:45:16 Peter Stuge wrote: > Mike Frysinger wrote: > > > But where is the problem? One idea is to provide another > > > implementation of these commands than the one in shadow. > > > > this is a bad idea >=20 > I don't like it either. There would eventually be compatibility > problems, and it doesn't consider NSS. that's one example (out of the infinite possibilities that pam introduces) although you could probably make a case for usage only under stage1/2/3 bui= lds=20 since these will all be local or just fix catalyst =2Dmike --nextPart1608773.941usaYVra Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJK12DwAAoJEEFjO5/oN/WBTJQP/2Qc5l0God+aF5zWJR1fb+st z5qJLENVL1g8o705BUaP9IwH++khBpcgpR48tR4EuFOtaO6lQ24yQLzeWW+xviwQ eGzJHq6WMrlFJOt3PxhPIIiyET42aXMenROOsOyt1NnVZXuLj0Gv1lOHCEeNPRTW JJM6XveDpr4XsYW0s1U4mHGX8xxEZbqXDVXugMMSV1X7jruIa4DDBMdzL5Ti07wb rFKGXPP+uY0XBjBptxHbMQUEGxaSzRSzY03VaiaLe3p9LA12/KV2fpGUE+vsj1r9 4HhVz1DVQZWuFdbPwZw6KAiajhUwwburk2jOAfKZZE80MAxAR+WFPRrBj3SG31hv 6Z5ArdKqmPBjIhvJJdPCFRQQ8K4C3GFDFZVGtLM5XG+yitnsCKMx4PASjCPdPZst LoJhzcDk58nzyV1R0HVuvl6/oqdX1zeA1vVJaV7Ird1iidxyMbz9+EPlxdoLrVsG 4xW9QJD7w3ATJNBe2DWNPfopIMmF5Ep1ZI9DG7kyH2lsL/TWJGrFs5cbSeGvnPNi 1RE+hc8SoULFacWqH2OhUTQ0HBFDVP5OE+HcMW7poJ1cU7glkT4ws1hh0BycziA3 pHqgnCswm9iDuq017ItUKAXzAxOwtXz+KjcwBCTX8UgUbCPPWl21ITXJRsenzSN9 FWpf6fGyMpl6lVHLGMBF =J1rU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1608773.941usaYVra--