From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MyUPl-0004wW-1X for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 15 Oct 2009 17:47:04 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B2BFEE0467; Thu, 15 Oct 2009 17:45:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from foo.birdnet.se (foo.birdnet.se [213.88.146.6]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 41BC6E0467 for ; Thu, 15 Oct 2009 17:45:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 24168 invoked by uid 501); 15 Oct 2009 17:45:16 -0000 Message-ID: <20091015174516.24167.qmail@stuge.se> Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 19:45:16 +0200 From: Peter Stuge To: gentoo-catalyst@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-catalyst] Too many problems with groupadd when creating stage3 Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-catalyst@lists.gentoo.org References: <200910151242.21514.vapier@gentoo.org> <20091015164850.14099.qmail@stuge.se> <200910151330.14644.vapier@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-catalyst@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-catalyst@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="p4qYPpj5QlsIQJ0K" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200910151330.14644.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 000b5a9d-edf4-4655-b878-3ff478eb8abf X-Archives-Hash: b7ff81c608fa979063f75d1c0d5135ca --p4qYPpj5QlsIQJ0K Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mike Frysinger wrote: > > > there is no problem with eutils.eclass > >=20 > > Because it is not intended to function for stage2? Or because it is > > intended to assume that groupadd and friends are available? >=20 > the release building tools (catalyst? or more like the profiles or spec files?) > have to make shadow available earlier for Linux targets Ok! Thanks for clearing it up! > > But where is the problem? One idea is to provide another > > implementation of these commands than the one in shadow. >=20 > this is a bad idea I don't like it either. There would eventually be compatibility problems, and it doesn't consider NSS. //Peter --p4qYPpj5QlsIQJ0K Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFK11+shR3Q0dhIfEgRArjgAKDNXnKVcD7zSfy90wgMe3ocqqWiKQCgh5bv W1KrkobVEftADUSm2FrOfs4= =wWC1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --p4qYPpj5QlsIQJ0K--