From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QatYM-0008LL-LU for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 17:55:31 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 64D341C131; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 17:55:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from foo.stuge.se (foo.stuge.se [212.181.44.140]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DC5091C131 for ; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 17:55:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 4200 invoked by uid 501); 26 Jun 2011 17:55:04 -0000 Message-ID: <20110626175504.4199.qmail@stuge.se> Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2011 19:55:04 +0200 From: Peter Stuge To: gentoo-catalyst@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-catalyst] Migrating man page to asciidoc? Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-catalyst@lists.gentoo.org References: <4E069B1F.8040409@gentoo.org> <20110626024929.GA6506@linux1> <4E06A41E.6000705@gentoo.org> <20110626033613.GA6577@linux1> <4E06AC3D.4000901@gentoo.org> <20110626043329.GA6710@linux1> <4E06BC27.3020808@gentoo.org> <20110626173348.GA8371@linux1> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-catalyst@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-catalyst@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="F8dlzb82+Fcn6AgP" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110626173348.GA8371@linux1> X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: d0ec92a1218bfe649bc1533e8ea1282e --F8dlzb82+Fcn6AgP Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline William Hubbs wrote: > Yes, it was added a couple of days ago, without giving a reasonable > amount of time for discussion. You know just as well as I do that this thread is the most discussion that this mailing list has seen in a very long time. Sebastian wants to make some progress. I see no problem. > For a significant change like this, "significant" is so subjective though. > I think we should give 24-48 hours and make the patch visible > somewhere It is clear that you are displeased because you think you did not have a chance to oppose the change before it was made. I can understand, but in reality I doubt the one opposing voice would have made a difference. > Remember that we have people here in multiple time zones, This is a given for all project. Not sure why you think anyone needs to be reminded of this. > and we don't necessarily check these lists every day. I would set some kind of notification up, so that response does not depend on me checking something. > Based on this as well as my previous objections I would like to see > this change reverted. I disagree and hope that most others do as well, so that development will continue instead of being stuck on senseless arguing with you. What about my suggestion to fix the actual problem, asciidoc dependencies, did you bother looking into that yet? (I haven't because I don't feel at all strongly.) Thanks! //Peter --F8dlzb82+Fcn6AgP Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFOB3J4hR3Q0dhIfEgRAipWAKC62KD+5AisKTmFiU3yfZiceQy8gACg5m0h VApgrnKy6qvNbmQ8IIsmLT0= =iKz/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --F8dlzb82+Fcn6AgP--