On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 05:30:40PM -0800, Brian Dolbec wrote:
> My aim for now is to debug the hell out of it, to stabilize all the
> existing changes, BEFORE doing a ton more changes.  That will also give
> me more experience in how catalyst is used, possibly ideas how to change
> it for the better.  I'll fix the doc's generation and make a setup.py
> and new 9999 ebuild.

I'm not suggesting additional changes on top of yours, I'm suggesting
new ones underneath yours, or alternatives to your current series.  It
seems a shame to spend time testing a work in progress, since you'll
probably want to re-test the final form before merging.  I'm trying to
help polish your series down before we invest a lot of time testing.

> Plus I need to focus more on another project needed for the git tree
> migration.

I have no problem waiting on the catalyst front if it helps push the
Git migration through.  I've been wishing for that for a while :D.

Instead of making my suggested changes on top of your series, I can
also make them underneath your series, and help rebase your series on
top.  That gets the changes I want in, and lets you focus on other
things at the same time ;).

I'm also ok with just waiting until folks have more time (e.g. the
catalyst-spec man page cooked for five months ;).

Cheers,
Trevor

-- 
This email may be signed or encrypted with GnuPG (http://www.gnupg.org).
For more information, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pretty_Good_Privacy