From: "W. Trevor King" <wking@tremily.us>
To: gentoo-catalyst@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-catalyst] Binary package dependencies and update_seed
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2013 13:09:41 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130411170941.GA14224@odin.tremily.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130309121023.GE26574@odin.tremily.us>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2622 bytes --]
On Sat, Mar 09, 2013 at 07:10:23AM -0500, W. Trevor King wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 08, 2013 at 12:14:08PM -0800, Matt Turner wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 10:47 AM, W. Trevor King <wking@tremily.us> wrote:
> > > The earlier update_seed
> > > command was not catching the bumped mpc, so add:
> >
> > I think this is a false premise. If it is true, we should understand
> > why and fix it. The current command is emerge --onlydeps gcc which
> > should be completely sufficient to update mpc.
>
> Using catalyst as of d1c2ba9b (create-iso.sh: add usb boot via
> isohybrid, 2013-03-05), I can no longer reproduce my original problem.
Ben Kohler (iamben) was working through this problem on #gentoo-releng
recently. His problem (and probably my original problem as well)
seems to be leftover binary packages from before update_seed was
enabled. These binary packages matched the version number and USE
flags of the to-be-installed package, but were built against the older
version of mpc. In order to avoid problems like this, it's probably a
good idea to remove all the cached stuff with something like [1]:
$ rm -rf --one-file-system /var/tmp/catalyst/{kerncache,packages,tmp}
before building your stage1.
A better approach would involve recording runtime dependency versions
in the binary package metadata, so that Portage could determine
whether a given binary package would work in the target system [2].
Currently, the ebuild RDEPEND is included in Packages, but that does
not always (or even often) specify which package versions were used to
build the package. For example, sys-devel/gcc lists:
RDEPEND: sys-libs/zlib virtual/libiconv >=dev-libs/gmp-4.3.2
>=dev-libs/mpfr-2.4.2 >=dev-libs/mpc-0.8.1
I'd like it to list:
RDEPEND: =sys-libs/zlib-1.2.7 =virtual/libiconv-0
=dev-libs/gmp-5.0.2_p1 =dev-libs/mpfr-3.1.1 =dev-libs/mpc-1.0.1
or whatever the versions of those packages were at build time.
Portage could then recurse through this information and only use the
package if versions matched the target system across the whole RDEPEND
tree. With ABI sub-slots, strict version matching could be loosened
to only require ABI matching.
Cheers,
Trevor
[1]: kerncache probably doesn't matter, but we might as well be
thorough.
[2]: This is a limitation with the current Portage code, and not a
catalyst issue. Maybe I should cross-post this to
gentoo-portage-dev@?
--
This email may be signed or encrypted with GnuPG (http://www.gnupg.org).
For more information, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pretty_Good_Privacy
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-11 17:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 76+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-26 16:20 [gentoo-catalyst] patch, fix broken seed stage update Brian Dolbec
2013-02-26 16:37 ` W. Trevor King
2013-02-26 16:47 ` Brian Dolbec
2013-02-26 16:48 ` Peter Stuge
2013-02-26 17:29 ` Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina
2013-02-26 19:39 ` Matt Turner
2013-02-27 2:04 ` Brian Dolbec
2013-02-27 2:37 ` Matt Turner
2013-02-27 12:12 ` W. Trevor King
2013-02-27 2:37 ` Matt Turner
2013-02-27 3:03 ` Brian Dolbec
2013-02-27 3:22 ` Matt Turner
2013-02-27 3:49 ` Brian Dolbec
2013-03-08 17:27 ` [gentoo-catalyst] [PATCH v2] Remove update_seed_command and strengthen update_seed W. Trevor King
2013-03-08 18:34 ` Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina
2013-03-08 18:47 ` [gentoo-catalyst] [PATCH v3] Strengthen update_seed to update @system and @world with dependencies W. Trevor King
2013-03-08 20:14 ` Matt Turner
2013-03-09 12:10 ` [gentoo-catalyst] " W. Trevor King
2013-04-11 17:09 ` W. Trevor King [this message]
2013-04-11 17:39 ` [gentoo-catalyst] Binary package dependencies and update_seed Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina
2013-04-11 17:52 ` W. Trevor King
2013-04-12 15:12 ` [gentoo-catalyst] [PATCH] files/catalyst.conf: Document linking issues with binary packages W. Trevor King
2013-04-12 15:21 ` Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina
2013-04-12 15:33 ` W. Trevor King
2013-04-12 16:11 ` Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina
2013-04-12 18:21 ` [gentoo-catalyst] [PATCH v2 0/2] pkgcache warning in catalyst-config(5) W. Trevor King
2013-04-12 18:21 ` [gentoo-catalyst] [PATCH v2 1/2] doc/catalyst-config.5.txt: Add man page for catalyst.conf W. Trevor King
2013-04-12 18:27 ` [gentoo-catalyst] " W. Trevor King
2013-04-12 18:47 ` [gentoo-catalyst] " Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina
2013-04-12 19:05 ` W. Trevor King
2013-04-12 19:30 ` Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina
2013-04-16 1:33 ` [gentoo-catalyst] [PATCH v3 0/2] pkgcache warning in catalyst-config(5) W. Trevor King
2013-04-16 1:33 ` [gentoo-catalyst] [PATCH v3 1/2] doc/catalyst-config.5.txt: Add man page for catalyst.conf W. Trevor King
2013-04-16 1:33 ` [gentoo-catalyst] [PATCH v3 2/2] doc/catalyst-config.5.txt: Document linking issues with binary packages W. Trevor King
2013-12-14 5:41 ` [gentoo-catalyst] Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] pkgcache warning in catalyst-config(5) W. Trevor King
2013-04-12 18:21 ` [gentoo-catalyst] [PATCH v2 2/2] doc/catalyst-config.5.txt: Document linking issues with binary packages W. Trevor King
2013-04-11 18:20 ` [gentoo-catalyst] Binary package dependencies and update_seed Matt Turner
2013-04-11 18:22 ` Matt Turner
2013-04-11 18:53 ` Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina
2013-04-11 19:00 ` W. Trevor King
2013-04-11 19:03 ` Matt Turner
2013-04-11 19:18 ` Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina
2013-04-11 20:24 ` Matt Turner
2013-04-11 20:34 ` W. Trevor King
2013-04-12 1:11 ` W. Trevor King
2013-04-11 20:37 ` Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina
2013-04-11 18:53 ` W. Trevor King
2013-04-12 6:57 ` Brian Dolbec
2013-04-16 19:42 ` [gentoo-catalyst] [PATCH 0/2] Blacklisting binary packages W. Trevor King
2013-04-16 19:42 ` [gentoo-catalyst] [PATCH 1/2] spec: Add binpkg_blacklist option for troublesome packages W. Trevor King
2013-04-16 19:42 ` [gentoo-catalyst] [PATCH 2/2] Revert "don't build packages during update_seed" W. Trevor King
2013-04-16 20:35 ` [gentoo-catalyst] [PATCH 0/2] Blacklisting binary packages Matt Turner
2013-04-16 20:59 ` W. Trevor King
[not found] ` <516DD074.3090906@gentoo.org>
2013-04-16 22:53 ` W. Trevor King
2013-04-17 4:18 ` Brian Dolbec
2013-04-17 11:30 ` W. Trevor King
2013-04-17 14:57 ` Matt Turner
2013-04-19 14:11 ` Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina
2013-04-19 16:18 ` W. Trevor King
2013-04-19 16:32 ` Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina
2013-04-19 16:36 ` W. Trevor King
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-01-08 8:32 [gentoo-catalyst] More proposed Catalyst changes Brian Dolbec
2013-01-08 18:08 ` Peter Stuge
2013-01-12 8:55 ` Brian Dolbec
2013-01-31 18:39 ` W. Trevor King
2013-01-31 19:46 ` W. Trevor King
2013-02-02 20:41 ` Brian Dolbec
2013-02-03 12:44 ` W. Trevor King
2013-04-11 2:06 ` [gentoo-catalyst] chmod +x all sh scripts so they can run from the git checkout W. Trevor King
2013-02-02 18:45 ` [gentoo-catalyst] More proposed Catalyst changes Brian Dolbec
2013-02-03 12:20 ` W. Trevor King
2013-02-26 18:04 ` [gentoo-catalyst] patch, fix broken seed stage update W. Trevor King
2013-02-27 1:30 ` Brian Dolbec
2013-02-27 1:40 ` W. Trevor King
2013-02-27 2:35 ` Brian Dolbec
2013-02-27 2:41 ` Matt Turner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130411170941.GA14224@odin.tremily.us \
--to=wking@tremily.us \
--cc=gentoo-catalyst@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox