On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 12:32:14PM -0400, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina wrote:
> It may be a good idea to make this patch depend on your other
> patchset which fixes up some of the documentation and adding more
> detailed documentation....unless you already did that and I'm not
> paying attention.

That's a good idea.  I'd be happy to rebase either series on top of
the other to flesh out the documentation, but I think I'll wait until
after one of them lands in master.  This fix and the warning message
series seem fairly distinct to me, and having smaller patch series
seems easier to review.

If anyone out there is thinking “I would definately merge this stuff
if it was all in one big series instead of scattered about in topic
branches”, please tell me ;).  I can certainly do that if y'all
prefer.

Cheers,
Trevor

-- 
This email may be signed or encrypted with GnuPG (http://www.gnupg.org).
For more information, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pretty_Good_Privacy