From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D77A81381F3 for ; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 16:36:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6420AE0807; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 16:36:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vms173003pub.verizon.net (vms173003pub.verizon.net [206.46.173.3]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0505E0807 for ; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 16:36:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from odin.tremily.us ([unknown] [72.68.100.81]) by vms173003.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.02 32bit (built Apr 16 2009)) with ESMTPA id <0MLI00K9WGSX5F90@vms173003.mailsrvcs.net> for gentoo-catalyst@lists.gentoo.org; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 11:36:34 -0500 (CDT) Received: by odin.tremily.us (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 40117970610; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 12:36:33 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 12:36:33 -0400 From: "W. Trevor King" To: gentoo-catalyst@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-catalyst] [PATCH 0/2] Blacklisting binary packages Message-id: <20130419163632.GE32441@odin.tremily.us> References: <20130309121023.GE26574@odin.tremily.us> <517150A6.8020207@gentoo.org> <20130419161816.GD32441@odin.tremily.us> <5171718E.3040508@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-catalyst@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-catalyst@lists.gentoo.org MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary=phCU5ROyZO6kBE05 Content-disposition: inline In-reply-to: <5171718E.3040508@gentoo.org> OpenPGP: id=39A2F3FA2AB17E5D8764F388FC29BDCDF15F5BE8; url=http://tremily.us/pubkey.txt User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Archives-Salt: 3908882b-2d63-4d58-b086-79e9d0d09c30 X-Archives-Hash: f9b2fb69787d418b9092527725f097af --phCU5ROyZO6kBE05 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 12:32:14PM -0400, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina wrote: > It may be a good idea to make this patch depend on your other > patchset which fixes up some of the documentation and adding more > detailed documentation....unless you already did that and I'm not > paying attention. That's a good idea. I'd be happy to rebase either series on top of the other to flesh out the documentation, but I think I'll wait until after one of them lands in master. This fix and the warning message series seem fairly distinct to me, and having smaller patch series seems easier to review. If anyone out there is thinking =E2=80=9CI would definately merge this stuff if it was all in one big series instead of scattered about in topic branches=E2=80=9D, please tell me ;). I can certainly do that if y'all prefer. Cheers, Trevor --=20 This email may be signed or encrypted with GnuPG (http://www.gnupg.org). For more information, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pretty_Good_Privacy --phCU5ROyZO6kBE05 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJRcXKOAAoJEEUbTsx0l5OM92cQAJNas1y7/LUQrgOU1wOjbJd6 7yY08vPcJaLNXTrkYBK28vAXIYTqHug0LQ88uHhV2TdxmNF7k2NXVv3ZOH5mj3+y OATKvRnYaHoMgYtsnMe9UGqgXCwBG06RbJqgQ1oRNbq8LCML5N0RN9lyiz+Zt/Sl X8Zi4R9QWSFOmm6QxrD9kOBbPTTpSwEooPJH89ZRIhnAmY2dniR0bWAOMLt3UOrk quEBmiQqlIY60OV3XElDatWX6ICN5kgE9yhpv55QP8uLbMxRr4evLL4z20gNNuUp DkVHGP2aPJdZwoWteTmztHYDIU+Fzn4+7ggr7MZMDMmoyPKZhNSdVSb+KoW+LERU mXKtq8r6CcnPJiGflyZXDXNFalyWXw9Lchaf+GxRPeazLtbfGZdikjDJRVYomEnb 73yOzPBjlQa8PIbDE5WNw1xXfLKFVc+R9wrLm9NZrjL+JnZ3+Gq8Sw5xCNWmyHuG vUUtUVCf2SNRvWnGaUQeCmSGvVOnzGKejVzCLS1mkRTNRlExEoJN9lAJyBXZcfmz w7GLUTSyZyT2sx9YVBibmIEtKy/Z+UjZE5/jAkOcdjMfrQ0x7p29poQ/oJud8w1a PYkl4pIPxU8V9VkwTc75xDmSyNsac8yNuZiQLFZDkcs4bFBgyE3cDo3yPaOaIUz2 DO70MxE7GkqANZRjBF4W =OhLh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --phCU5ROyZO6kBE05--