On Sat, Dec 28, 2013 at 06:54:28AM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Saturday 28 December 2013 01:11:08 Brian Dolbec wrote:
> > I don't know if catalyst can do that or not and whether it can
> > detect it to run perl-cleaner.
> 
> catalyst certainly could grow code for handling perl-cleaner &
> friends.

This sounds like a job for Portage and @preserved-rebuild ;).  It has
already absorbed revdep-rebuild.  Hopefully absorbing perl-cleaner,
python-updater, and similar is just a matter of time :p.

Cheers,
Trevor

-- 
This email may be signed or encrypted with GnuPG (http://www.gnupg.org).
For more information, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pretty_Good_Privacy