On 22 Sep 2015 14:34, Leno Hou wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 2:21 AM, Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> wrote:
> 
> > On 21 Sep 2015 13:15, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
> > > On 9/21/15 10:02 AM, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina wrote:
> > > > On 09/21/2015 08:38 AM, Leno Hou wrote:
> > > >> +          self.settings["CHOST"]="powerpc64le-linux-gnu"
> > >
> > > The CHOST is incorrect.  It should powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu. Leno,
> > > can you please try to switch it to that and do another catalyst run.
> > > You can begin with your current stage3 with the above CHOST and it
> > > should work out correctly to the new CHOST name.  In another place you
> > > said there is no compiler "powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu" but that makes
> > > no sense.  The tuple is parsed by gnuconfig script and it should work
> > > like all other CHOST names we have in gentoo.
> >
> > powerpc64le-linux-gnu is a valid tuple (vendor can generally be omitted),
> > but in Gentoo we do use "unknown" for our ppc ports.  so do as Anthony
> > says ;).
> > -mike
> >
> 
> When set CHOST="powerpc64le-linux-gnu", successfully compiled stage1.
> But CHOST="powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu", something happens as following.
> https://bpaste.net/show/189b2b12d8e2
> 
> So I think CHOST="powerpc64le-linux-gnu" would be better.

i think you're misreading things.  we didn't say "powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu",
we said "powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu".
-mike