From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AC3913888F for ; Tue, 6 Oct 2015 03:19:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9A376E0826; Tue, 6 Oct 2015 03:19:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E48E1E0826 for ; Tue, 6 Oct 2015 03:19:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vapier.lan (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6B9CB340775 for ; Tue, 6 Oct 2015 03:19:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 23:19:02 -0400 From: Mike Frysinger To: gentoo-catalyst@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-catalyst] culling the catalyst repo branches Message-ID: <20151006031902.GG6518@vapier.lan> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-catalyst@lists.gentoo.org References: <56133118.2050205@gentoo.org> <20151006023603.GF6518@vapier.lan> <561335FF.8060304@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-catalyst@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-catalyst@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="h56sxpGKRmy85csR" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <561335FF.8060304@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 6e8d1eef-3b24-4760-9f2a-e43730e50541 X-Archives-Hash: 289e1ebe02dbd4f02909d4d990044399 --h56sxpGKRmy85csR Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 05 Oct 2015 22:46, Anthony G. Basile wrote: > On 10/5/15 10:36 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On 05 Oct 2015 22:25, Anthony G. Basile wrote: > >> Okay time to do some cleanup. I want to nuke the catalyst_2 and > >> catalyst_3 branches. dol-sen is going to take care of pending and 3.0. > >> I have no idea what write-on-master and tar-volume-label are so my > >> feeling is to nuke those too unless someone speaks up and said, wait N= O! > > rather than delete branches (and thus history), how about we move them = to > > a "old/" or "dead/" namespace ? then it'd be: > > refs/heads/ > > |-- 2.x > > |-- 3.0 > > |-- master > > `-- old > > |-- catalyst_2 > > |-- catalyst_3 > > |-- rewrite-on-master > > `-- tar-volume-label >=20 > yeah even better, except i'm not sure how to do nested branches like=20 > that. i'll google it. that part is simple :). there's nothing special with refs. create a copy first: $ git push origin -n remotes/origin/catalyst_2:refs/heads/old/catalyst_2 To git+ssh://git@git.gentoo.org/proj/catalyst.git * [new branch] origin/catalyst_2 -> old/catalyst_2 then delete the old one: $ git push origin -n :refs/heads/catalyst_2 To git+ssh://git@git.gentoo.org/proj/catalyst.git - [deleted] catalyst_2 -mike --h56sxpGKRmy85csR Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJWEz2mAAoJEEFjO5/oN/WBHdwP/28BvSnuSs0gpxoentxjSjse JdL6CebL4F2PGQg11csnoa6+pRuUVSa3RfgQ3KNMCoiDIOs9nfzCvNQ2kQmcEuN6 7+BxS2xgP3ygTAQfsgDQpUlg1p/6gCL+nobtDKhgpPEQi8LiAJ0KvSA8f+Oj02lK snxvNqsUppvS10J3yWp4ZGgf1sbZZifZwNTZfZHajUkBB27brsfTvHRJosOYVy9g +9o7MTv2xO/ww5SQ4m+ASLe813hiIQ1mm7eUT7a0YOS7ljNl92xaLrmfqNDj1CyM Vmt05uxSUb/krnDHxwzA18mj8dzqPgEFNfh5vuE4VrUjLm9Jt8tpb2cFdfYgE2sj mJXIH32YSPQqv7iAHf9k4n5tiz9KO6Uw7HFBOdK6ms4H3x8Rxa2zfqHV1Tjbqi4k X2JsU5S8NHUA5Lp/V8v+aSrszKTrnbSugzanVWja2DDoZg11qxr88kWZ76C34/I+ NqOw6PVF7zYcWK8SSC1SN8L+c58WnVupo3ovXL+gpRHJOVX7+GSTzc/T3d9iXEoV 1c+DjvEjwLOD2dE7M7zWw11kQFsOB26QbYJLwc0hLI/paayzQRRg8mA2KY5/w8Aq 9GPWxlu9LpjcwDqfCZ8K6bw0sPDQdFRXKQ8iA3lmvvnupejnpITyUWNvzg6rSIwN JHztZVNlT0NXvn/HkSIW =Z6Ph -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --h56sxpGKRmy85csR--