From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BC691381F3 for ; Sun, 13 Oct 2013 20:49:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 234B8E09DA; Sun, 13 Oct 2013 20:49:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pa0-f47.google.com (mail-pa0-f47.google.com [209.85.220.47]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8782BE09DA for ; Sun, 13 Oct 2013 20:49:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pa0-f47.google.com with SMTP id kp14so6694950pab.34 for ; Sun, 13 Oct 2013 13:49:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-type; bh=Yr8Mjpfq+VOV78GnwB5RjDrKzlS4rdXBIhFElGpATfU=; b=Z2aCMbWa69Y+9Kpm1y2fTHQUAWKw5SEnoTPBHeiIM7hMf/WxCNa0M2ok+3bg847OML hL/bXQaHgEapVN7/mtkg8e59jAIPoC9XEQy56UT+tofvx0KKiATVrKJl48aeRXq/OGor A+oZ6qpBfTcV6XaA9H6dfm+K+WNPhP7CkewfTtRKncnXfHVVhWFqrecVNzYOC9gjmsLO 41OGnky/wOsI6LxDSQyBwJX9B00R2dNMhs/vNit9a+kTmG6dVKM6w4pU2LMR3Zct/sMT 14Eb2tBT3VulmYfeRCIKdVrr8gsT0Sc7JnjFP2TnOQBDGxODX/g4bNYUiy66on0GnFj/ fqgQ== X-Received: by 10.67.30.70 with SMTP id kc6mr33357760pad.32.1381697385395; Sun, 13 Oct 2013 13:49:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from moiraine.localnet ([50.126.105.238]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id yo2sm86311925pab.8.1969.12.31.16.00.00 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 13 Oct 2013 13:49:44 -0700 (PDT) From: Dylan Baker To: gentoo-catalyst@lists.gentoo.org Cc: Matt Turner Subject: Re: [gentoo-catalyst] why are pyo files checked into git? Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2013 13:49:41 -0700 Message-ID: <2207994.42M1GshaRA@moiraine> User-Agent: KMail/4.11.2 (Linux/3.11.0; KDE/4.11.2; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: <2422563.SkjbLSKSis@moiraine> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-catalyst@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-catalyst@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart4213302.RivfBIaMer"; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: df0f1dfd-bde7-4be7-b29e-74f205adfba6 X-Archives-Hash: 6a0a49bcd89ed71c1d49c6487f46fdb0 --nextPart4213302.RivfBIaMer Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" On Sunday, October 13, 2013 11:19:15 AM Matt Turner wrote: > On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 1:58 AM, Dylan Baker wrote: > > I'm just wondering why (slightly, and maybe determinatally) optimized > > versions of the python modules are checked into git and distributed with > > it? > > > > I'm asking becasue there are a couple of problems with pyo files (vs pyc), > > namely they strip assert statements. The second concern is that the only > > benefit is that they will make a first run slightly faster, after that the > > user should be able to generate them themselves, and being binary git > > won't > > handle them well. > > In which branch? I just checked and didn't spot any pyc or pyo files in git. Yeah, I just realized that I shouldn't send emails at 2Am... --nextPart4213302.RivfBIaMer Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAABAgAGBQJSWwdoAAoJEAieFpYUBojv4bkH/iqL1Ve4/RdIQa7bt66eqKIO 3aSEXZyQJa84cdupVCqNr3A/PIUBScFjCsJHLGa4WTXLI1oWBhHJMyRBd28KqKLO 5IdSrz3V2ki9oH9gN7hjbh0t/k3rBmVq7vroN1nnVUAdkpuZ4UdxBzV9Vlis+7zy TQsBpJqSUeThH+qnbjx1peB6wW9EmqgoTVDWr69jdmM7wihpuYAZOi2XqAl426u/ nr/ajUJt2J1LidAPG86pjTQpgyo0lkfWwarvio7qNxX/97nRs5QSsnGME6GJQYQD 5LqvZbqf66xbpMxn3FM1MmT5GHLU1hdUhBjUJashPIdiw0gS9x67b+06PhB/5I4= =c6pm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart4213302.RivfBIaMer--