From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Qb0rY-0000GH-Pb for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 01:43:44 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E201E1C023; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 01:43:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtprelay02.ispgateway.de (smtprelay02.ispgateway.de [80.67.31.25]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A009A1C023 for ; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 01:43:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [85.179.23.159] (helo=[192.168.1.2]) by smtprelay02.ispgateway.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1Qb0rE-0007Lp-EL for gentoo-catalyst@lists.gentoo.org; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 03:43:24 +0200 Message-ID: <4E07E039.1000308@gentoo.org> Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 03:43:21 +0200 From: Sebastian Pipping User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110526 Thunderbird/3.1.10 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-catalyst@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-catalyst@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-catalyst@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-catalyst] Migrating man page to asciidoc? References: <20110626024929.GA6506@linux1> <4E06A41E.6000705@gentoo.org> <20110626033613.GA6577@linux1> <4E06AC3D.4000901@gentoo.org> <20110626043329.GA6710@linux1> <4E06BC27.3020808@gentoo.org> <20110626173348.GA8371@linux1> <20110626175504.4199.qmail@stuge.se> <4E07C031.1030004@gentoo.org> <20110627000035.10174.qmail@stuge.se> <4E07CF74.5020900@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <4E07CF74.5020900@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Df-Sender: sping-gentoo@binera.de X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: c4c599dc77da0d17397884a8d923d1b5 On 06/27/2011 02:31 AM, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote: > [..] when you try to merge catalyst-9999. While you mention 9999: are you using 9999 for private stuff or for the real releng releases? If it's releng why choose 9999 over 2.0.6.916? (If you told me on IRC I forgot.) At least the ebuilds still say that 3.x is not supported and that even bug reports should not be taken to bugzilla, directly. Maybe that's an indicator that master should be merged (one way or another) into catalyst_2 code, not the other way around. Best, Sebastian