Re: [gentoo-catalyst] Migrating man page to asciidoc?

[Sebastian Pipping <sping@gentoo.org>]

On 06/27/2011 05:55 PM, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
> On 06/27/2011 05:58 AM, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
>> We use 2.0.6.916 on official releng releases.
>> I tried 9999 on my private tests because [..]
> 
> To me that leaves the question who uses 9999 for serious stuff at all.
> In case it's no one (which we should find out) we could trash that
> branch and fully concentrate on calalyst_2.
> 
> I guess that sounds a bit radical at first.  It doesn't have to be a
> quick decision.  Also, version control allows us to bring it back if needed.
> 
> Ideas on find out who is using 9999:
> 
>  - Removing 9999 ebuild from the tree and see who's complaining
> 
>  - Resetting branch master to nothing but a README announcing
>    the possible death of that thread and a request to join
>    this mailing list and speak up about it if there is need.
> 
>  - Asking on one/some/all of gentoo-dev, gentoo-user, gentoo forums,
>    planet gentoo.
> 
> After such action I imagine a time window of 2 to 4 weeks to give people
> a chance to react.
> 
> What do you think?
> 
> 
>> I can confirm that the build with the master branch fails as it doesn't
>> seem able to find the spec files or doesn't accept them - the official
>> ones we use to build weekly releases.
> 
> That seems to further decrease the chance that someone is using 9999 for
> real to me.

One week has passed by.  Anyone?



Sebastian