From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9488513827E for ; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 17:43:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 24E6DE09D7; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 17:43:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 99E6CE09D7 for ; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 17:43:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.13] (pool-72-95-221-222.pitbpa.fios.verizon.net [72.95.221.222]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: zerochaos) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BEA8833F1A5 for ; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 17:43:00 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <52A9F607.3010301@gentoo.org> Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 12:44:39 -0500 From: "Rick \"Zero_Chaos\" Farina" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.1 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-catalyst@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-catalyst@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-catalyst@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-catalyst] Does subarch determine profile or stage3 seed? References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: b4e081fe-621e-40db-89ef-9a9a96aa2c11 X-Archives-Hash: a59ff245417c1c71dd3bad110fbe48fc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 12/11/2013 02:52 AM, lin pro wrote: > Hi, when I set the seed to be stage3-i686 and the profile to be x86/13.0 > catalyst fails on my amd64 host. Can catalyst build for x86 on a amd host? > There's a message that the personality of x86 will be build but it fails at > the profile saying that the make.profile link is broken. It is not though. > > Thanks for any answer > Ben > That's how we do the official x86 builds, and I honestly don't think anyone is doing x86 building on an x86 host anymore. So in short, yes, that works fine. We can try to help if you post your spec. - -Zero -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJSqfYHAAoJEKXdFCfdEflKVgkQAKGSRgA2qrxLPJW9+VDZ5lCY RGKJFxYyT/zq2srDqh/9sGP6WlVGFQa0RQO70fx6t3tOxWSmVskBjLBzC4g/ypR+ dgFEdzQyO1h2kzw6HpUy2Nn6syWvWmlE6bw47V6P0A28AJ/+74/FPuQOYM0X5Dfb IapSd0rgVl+k/HC8tBOq68ruscabjwbDoKIoSSWDvtKq5fWq15Cgon09q9c2BbM2 opMTf9PbimHYsRaYeilGkPzJ3Qg8Rm5sBY7Eu/IYhMh1EZRG80gosws5ghk1vt0a Nq8ZZ213PwCEvayalt62XsjQ4ybTWURbSl4Vybg7ks1SYa3kAgZfZ13GJQCOMaED gs2c/BGAiyXwVVs4qkjf+YAwnO30qIwd6xPLhWh6nE9XN9e1GAa1uxr8El7bsIzF LL5B0m6qlM1ZIZSXDqil7QlL4QIATo04Hz2YBvP08sx6QjFQrMpEdfaIA08oSjfo oPfTc0y4cBlenV60hjfnE+QYxpJZnuIkOGXq5B6tVUezKbamIBPcPbqQLFvXtz91 8hwBNmlRXTpL6UR+motuHYBufmqNFBQS5ZIS0jTXi3YDQCxV4p9/KLfOgQhJhfT8 FeZ044DJIMCYiLpA8oRSUWUbEBRMSIz68WSfj/0tDYOG8p/OHqTxIeCSuFW7up47 eGyrj841K2wRbkKXO73j =oCRQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----