From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1139138819 for ; Sat, 14 Dec 2013 03:13:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E07B2E0A80; Sat, 14 Dec 2013 03:13:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48493E0A80 for ; Sat, 14 Dec 2013 03:13:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.13] (pool-72-95-221-222.pitbpa.fios.verizon.net [72.95.221.222]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: zerochaos) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 37EE733F203 for ; Sat, 14 Dec 2013 03:13:13 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <52ABCD31.6040205@gentoo.org> Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 22:14:57 -0500 From: "Rick \"Zero_Chaos\" Farina" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.1 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-catalyst@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-catalyst@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-catalyst@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-catalyst] Does subarch determine profile or stage3 seed? References: <52A9F607.3010301@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: e2881df8-fee9-4092-a215-d8b67a0d74ad X-Archives-Hash: 6bf49513ce6ce942028b8c894d0b2d3a -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 12/13/2013 09:22 PM, lin pro wrote: > On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 12:38 AM, Matt Turner wrote: > >> >> Using an amd64 profile but attempting to build a 32-bit x86 stage? >> > > Ok then, > So I was misled by the sentence on the official catalyst page about > amd64 being able to build x86 code. My thinkin was that one could mix You were not mislead, you misread. Those are two different things. You are trying to build for x86 (fine) but you declare an amd64 profile (not fine). Change the profile to an x86 profile and you are all set. - -Zero > architectures. From what you suggest, I think, is that one may mix > architecture with a subarch within host's main architecture, like so: > amd64 > amd64, amdfam10, athlon64, athlon64-sse3, athlonfx, > barcelona, core2, k8, k8-sse3, nocona, > opteron, opteron-sse3, x32 > > Anyway, I suppose I need to change the spec file to include > subarch: core2 > if I want to build for intel core i3 processor, Is that correct? > And that I cannot use any subarch from within x86 when I build on a amd64 host? > > Thank you for any input. > Ben > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJSq80xAAoJEKXdFCfdEflKkVMP/Av6oTrLBWVi3/3/SXXDiUrF ZupCo+j2XLKvHKQS2B5f3bFJHrt0RKOEnxp8l6Rtua9KCIXrWYXn+zofsdzcNeXq RnJqpucWzYWqZM9SfT8w5YdgiYlvMUuGYbVl06FBjGbZdsqy3FsbeF9P4A/RiewZ Z15JyTZLEn7uE2ZKXiDkcRUUrEYaaXnQEUUUSryWUEEpnZoDY9rleOkfRH8kiebb RV3Bi2UW03Z6I8nN5L3PkWOez7mcZ/tJbacgmVRWnoROeWe+9cTbI6/uCyiFN9s9 DYrXnY/qIq1RGwyvfEs52zOiPqW8Zb2EwDo1rnJsmjweZhRKkx8T09kCI0YDCO7K HEKcgCMiowGclDHusM2+FTyx0ES2BKFHWcAbaGApmLkg/A5nocPuWDdh4do1rZ89 QQO2RKntfDBNzTThF+3p/yzI73WGWaNs4NU229IFqEeD1yIZ2iEp9+Qn1QSMQvaH RM2YWBvm7PuhFIjA7/gGq1XDZSWnGY8l5tSHeRcSOyjzxCDsa8Hg+0+Zp0jO2x1v wrR1HzbOgSuzDj3dI1ZekZxFtqaWDSNhsXkgZX7mShMFkveWETJlN4/+SgesdJJV PbpjI+2hoA1QJvz9TkeuvQRoEaMeTNWAE0khu9fvDXClbjsS82xAdB/4FAmSdiOl 7uE33X72My17SrAyENfS =qLIu -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----