From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D9AA13888F for ; Tue, 6 Oct 2015 03:13:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9D8B1E0835; Tue, 6 Oct 2015 03:13:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F258E0835 for ; Tue, 6 Oct 2015 03:13:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from greysprite.dite (cpe-74-77-145-97.buffalo.res.rr.com [74.77.145.97]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: blueness) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D73F9340813 for ; Tue, 6 Oct 2015 03:13:49 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [gentoo-catalyst] culling the catalyst repo branches To: gentoo-catalyst@lists.gentoo.org References: <56133118.2050205@gentoo.org> <20151006023603.GF6518@vapier.lan> <561335FF.8060304@gentoo.org> From: "Anthony G. Basile" Message-ID: <56133C6A.1000200@gentoo.org> Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 23:13:46 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-catalyst@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-catalyst@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <561335FF.8060304@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: e53bcaa0-14fe-419d-9453-a8710204dee4 X-Archives-Hash: 1515eec23bec2b66516e2bd7f7c85d39 On 10/5/15 10:46 PM, Anthony G. Basile wrote: > On 10/5/15 10:36 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: >> On 05 Oct 2015 22:25, Anthony G. Basile wrote: >>> Okay time to do some cleanup. I want to nuke the catalyst_2 and >>> catalyst_3 branches. dol-sen is going to take care of pending and 3.0. >>> I have no idea what write-on-master and tar-volume-label are so my >>> feeling is to nuke those too unless someone speaks up and said, wait >>> NO! >> rather than delete branches (and thus history), how about we move >> them to >> a "old/" or "dead/" namespace ? then it'd be: >> refs/heads/ >> |-- 2.x >> |-- 3.0 >> |-- master >> `-- old >> |-- catalyst_2 >> |-- catalyst_3 >> |-- rewrite-on-master >> `-- tar-volume-label >> -mike > > yeah even better, except i'm not sure how to do nested branches like > that. i'll google it. > Okay its pretty easy. I'm not going to use gitnamespaces(7) but just copy the branches to branches named old/catalyst_2 etc which will give the above structure. This will keep the history but the branches will show up as "old/catalyst_2" on gitweb.g.o under branch. -- Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D. Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened] E-Mail : blueness@gentoo.org GnuPG FP : 1FED FAD9 D82C 52A5 3BAB DC79 9384 FA6E F52D 4BBA GnuPG ID : F52D4BBA