From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BA8C13888F for ; Wed, 28 Oct 2015 03:25:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CA11CE0825; Wed, 28 Oct 2015 03:25:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 08EC6E0825 for ; Wed, 28 Oct 2015 03:25:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.250] (pool-72-95-142-247.pitbpa.fios.verizon.net [72.95.142.247]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: zerochaos) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D9E05340924 for ; Wed, 28 Oct 2015 03:25:31 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [gentoo-catalyst] [PATCH] main: extend the -c option to accept multiple files To: gentoo-catalyst@lists.gentoo.org References: <1445925151-28893-1-git-send-email-vapier@gentoo.org> <56302A94.4060603@gentoo.org> <20151028025856.GC5154@vapier.lan> From: "Rick \"Zero_Chaos\" Farina" Message-ID: <56304040.8000701@gentoo.org> Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 23:25:52 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-catalyst@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-catalyst@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20151028025856.GC5154@vapier.lan> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 7dd8c5a3-fe83-48fa-9f4e-f08ff50fe5b1 X-Archives-Hash: 9e44ec09df0a45f79384b6af00fd2131 On 10/27/2015 10:58 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On 27 Oct 2015 21:53, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina wrote: >> I support this idea, but maybe we could leave the --config option so as >> not to confuse people who are only passing one config? > > that already works ;). python's argparse does partial matching, > so --config will be treated as --configs. > > the only breakage will be people who are passing multiple -c but > expecting only the last one to be expected. meh. +1 on the meh, if you pass multiple configs and expect it to ignore them I don't feel the need to save you. thanks! -Zero