From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-catalyst+bounces-2355-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1Qaf0Q-0007mb-Gc
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 02:23:26 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 352F21C079;
Sun, 26 Jun 2011 02:23:08 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDDDA1C079
for <gentoo-catalyst@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 02:23:07 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-vw0-f53.google.com (mail-vw0-f53.google.com [209.85.212.53])
(using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
(Authenticated sender: mattst88)
by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 412952AC0E7
for <gentoo-catalyst@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 02:23:07 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by vws13 with SMTP id 13so3394561vws.40
for <gentoo-catalyst@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 19:23:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.52.168.3 with SMTP id zs3mr6442785vdb.76.1309054985279; Sat,
25 Jun 2011 19:23:05 -0700 (PDT)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-catalyst@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-catalyst+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-catalyst+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-catalyst+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-catalyst.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-catalyst@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-catalyst@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.52.158.168 with HTTP; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 19:22:45 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4E062735.4050907@gentoo.org>
References: <4E062735.4050907@gentoo.org>
From: Matt Turner <mattst88@gentoo.org>
Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2011 22:22:45 -0400
Message-ID: <BANLkTi=+219xufNV_v84fo2qWijPGuMMpA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-catalyst] Differences between 2.x and 3.x, future merging
To: gentoo-catalyst@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Archives-Salt:
X-Archives-Hash: 72aafd4f8e4ef0cd6df72fc1504a82ba
On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 2:21 PM, Sebastian Pipping <sping@gentoo.org> wrote=
:
> Hello!
>
>
> The current process of copying changes from 2.x to 3.x or vice versa is
> suboptimal, especially with no recent merge commit around.
>
> I would like to start this thread to list and discuss differences
> between catalyst 2.x and 3.x so we can then decide what needs to be
> merged in which direction and then have a single branch soon (ideally)
> or at least two branches with clear and to-the-point diffs.
>
> Difference I have noticed (without searching) so far:
>
> =A0- Subarch "sh4aeb" is not supported on 3.x but 2.x
>
> =A0- Folder ./arch of 2.x is ./modules/catalyst/arch in 3.x
>
> Please add any differences you are aware of. =A0Many thanks!
As an aside, patches should go into master first, and cherry-picked
back to catalyst_2, not the other way around.
Matt