From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QbEVi-0007Tl-6s for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 16:18:06 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3A2851C074; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 16:17:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A9211C074 for ; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 16:17:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-vx0-f181.google.com (mail-vx0-f181.google.com [209.85.220.181]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mattst88) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4F1851BC028 for ; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 16:17:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vxa40 with SMTP id 40so4256316vxa.40 for ; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 09:17:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.68.162 with SMTP id x2mr8349359vdt.116.1309191464139; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 09:17:44 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-catalyst@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-catalyst@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.158.168 with HTTP; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 09:17:24 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Matt Turner Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 12:17:24 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-catalyst] How to accept licences To: gentoo-catalyst@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 6662cc3cfeddebcfba159d51b4a45b15 On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 11:43 AM, Martino Dell'Ambrogio wrote: > Hello, > > I'm trying to build a livecd with catalyst 2.0.6.916. > > While building the livecd-stage1 target I've got this obvious error: > > !!! All ebuilds that could satisfy "dev-java/sun-jdk" have been masked. > !!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your > request: > - dev-java/sun-jdk-1.6.0.26 (masked by: dlj-1.1 license(s)) > > I set portage_confdir to a path with a package.license file containing the > line "dev-java/sun-jdk dlj-1.1", but I got the same result. > > I tried with a package.license directory, with a "*" flag, even with an > export ACCEPT_LICENSE="*" within catalystrc, but portage seems to ignore all > of them. > The portage version is 2.1.9.42 for both host and build. Also both systems > are amd64. > > I can't seem to find my error anywhere, and I guess catalyst is aware of > everything LICENSE-related or it wouldn't be possible to build the official > distributions, right? Thank you for your help. Actually, the only references I see to 'license' when I grep the catalyst source appear in license headers. It looks to me like catalyst doesn't export any way to modify ACCEPT_LICENSES, though I would have thought that putting 'export ACCEPT_LICENSES=...' in catalystrc would work. Matt