From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 574A013827E for ; Sat, 14 Dec 2013 02:22:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C4EC7E0B9E; Sat, 14 Dec 2013 02:22:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-vb0-f51.google.com (mail-vb0-f51.google.com [209.85.212.51]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 40868E0B9E for ; Sat, 14 Dec 2013 02:22:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-vb0-f51.google.com with SMTP id 11so1848989vbe.10 for ; Fri, 13 Dec 2013 18:22:15 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=X0sP1y+/Ji56oaE+s7ttN4+itbkLb+jgSdfU63VdUnA=; b=XbmFUqN9plJHgLxOqc9L/kug43HnrIw7cUc4P1w2gdvBkw4CyxzqFqiekcdwXMpnjh Gg5oOoMLziH7MAxX+hFu/PGgs+bjk/fZWQifQD+zBb5zK+tihoShEHsIpB7Pc2tA1Qpa IfWCIcr5661wBdktrjDGvdz8yyTQRVUcRcCZvQpSSOfyzPmXyk/6PGegOZOvOPnCyskN XHPml55HUE+WDaWLCIOyDdiWCxC5u4lhoxfDW8xWxXyFUd1i2KtZSmLSe6ryXibeXC28 CN3IOjG44GRkeQ3cSdf44uCQKRchy320EPXw+Hxp6LLMlQegi0is3Jbl6JVEoKh27D9h E+Ng== Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-catalyst@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-catalyst@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.221.47.193 with SMTP id ut1mr2562393vcb.8.1386987735583; Fri, 13 Dec 2013 18:22:15 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.221.67.199 with HTTP; Fri, 13 Dec 2013 18:22:15 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <52A9F607.3010301@gentoo.org> Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 20:22:15 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-catalyst] Does subarch determine profile or stage3 seed? From: lin pro To: gentoo-catalyst@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Archives-Salt: 4ceeb10d-df32-4124-a5a6-9d04f2f4ba12 X-Archives-Hash: 5eade6fd3a89c4d81dcb3866a790fffe On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 12:38 AM, Matt Turner wrote: > > Using an amd64 profile but attempting to build a 32-bit x86 stage? > Ok then, So I was misled by the sentence on the official catalyst page about amd64 being able to build x86 code. My thinkin was that one could mix architectures. From what you suggest, I think, is that one may mix architecture with a subarch within host's main architecture, like so: amd64 amd64, amdfam10, athlon64, athlon64-sse3, athlonfx, barcelona, core2, k8, k8-sse3, nocona, opteron, opteron-sse3, x32 Anyway, I suppose I need to change the spec file to include subarch: core2 if I want to build for intel core i3 processor, Is that correct? And that I cannot use any subarch from within x86 when I build on a amd64 host? Thank you for any input. Ben -- best regards linforpros