From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1SBrly-0002T2-5m for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 25 Mar 2012 18:02:34 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 99005E072E for ; Sun, 25 Mar 2012 18:02:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25937E05A5 for ; Sun, 25 Mar 2012 17:42:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pb0-f53.google.com (mail-pb0-f53.google.com [209.85.160.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mattst88) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A79F51B4041 for ; Sun, 25 Mar 2012 17:42:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pbcuo1 with SMTP id uo1so6401516pbc.40 for ; Sun, 25 Mar 2012 10:42:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.234.193 with SMTP id ug1mr34168174pbc.161.1332697357361; Sun, 25 Mar 2012 10:42:37 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-catalyst@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-catalyst@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.191.229 with HTTP; Sun, 25 Mar 2012 10:42:17 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20120325145119.GA18637@odin.tremily.us> References: <20120218142551.GA2901@odin.tremily.us> <20120325145119.GA18637@odin.tremily.us> From: Matt Turner Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2012 13:42:17 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-catalyst] Re: [PATCH] First pass at a catalyst-spec man page. To: gentoo-catalyst@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: d4a9e995-8543-4db9-b0f5-59962f6a7482 X-Archives-Hash: ff0c5696943e51784f8235a1963728b3 On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 10:51 AM, W. Trevor King wrote: > On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 09:25:51AM -0500, W. Trevor King wrote: >> If the powers that be decide that this is a useful path forward, my >> next step would be to strip the repeated comments out of the example >> files, leaving only the comment content that goes beyond the general >> descriptions in the man page. > > I submitted a patch a last month, but haven't heard back from any > catalyst devs. =A0I'd still appreciate some feedback on this patch. =A0If > the silence means that everyone loves it ;), I'd welcome suggestions > on how to get it accepted into the main git repo :D. > > Cheers, > Trevor Sorry about that. We don't really have anyone (anymore) who is dedicated to catalyst. I'm busy for the next couple of days, but I'll try to look at it very soon. If someone else wants to beat me to it -- please do so. Thanks for the patch, and sorry for the delay. Matt