From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E2061381F3 for ; Sun, 13 Oct 2013 18:19:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 448BCE09BA; Sun, 13 Oct 2013 18:19:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B75CAE09BA for ; Sun, 13 Oct 2013 18:19:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qa0-f42.google.com (mail-qa0-f42.google.com [209.85.216.42]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mattst88) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B144233EF65 for ; Sun, 13 Oct 2013 18:19:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qa0-f42.google.com with SMTP id w8so1961938qac.8 for ; Sun, 13 Oct 2013 11:19:36 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=StaXfR7Z0TaWnArN0dlzbR/6SzbO4UBmXxExWRffMwI=; b=PRphfVU9F+WhJSLXC1MSCgXdGI+PMgiePktnmfhVtl+Pop31Ov0fF9b1495dWbI6fo HMQO0bQB1CiQ1rVPt5nNVxoI9OzysHA/Y4evslFGYxSqk4/gpo+3MJLQQNqnELYd+BL2 ZtjQDbOKV2rBwWFTFIAIbVEfSy/ORjHwhbyQPLixap+11hjKE3wNwZZFtLoNMFe1uOrP GIkSRg5pgYt5Lhy1gXVTWgq+mURzOXbrHr5k30Ow0+FWjwScvNQxw/I+PKWeJSe/x6mr KQj5h6/oR5dSRjbqUahK523ibHcKgOFEc7Z8m5FdusaCNw/Yaj96MYmd5sjnzskNSxm2 nxPQ== X-Received: by 10.224.64.130 with SMTP id e2mr17800650qai.43.1381688376066; Sun, 13 Oct 2013 11:19:36 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-catalyst@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-catalyst@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.49.86.66 with HTTP; Sun, 13 Oct 2013 11:19:15 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <2422563.SkjbLSKSis@moiraine> References: <2422563.SkjbLSKSis@moiraine> From: Matt Turner Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2013 11:19:15 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-catalyst] why are pyo files checked into git? To: gentoo-catalyst@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Archives-Salt: 30950f6a-8905-4b5c-8fac-20bd5a7430a8 X-Archives-Hash: ef37b96063edb9ac1eb9b0d57f3e3d22 On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 1:58 AM, Dylan Baker wrote: > I'm just wondering why (slightly, and maybe determinatally) optimized versions > of the python modules are checked into git and distributed with it? > > I'm asking becasue there are a couple of problems with pyo files (vs pyc), > namely they strip assert statements. The second concern is that the only > benefit is that they will make a first run slightly faster, after that the > user should be able to generate them themselves, and being binary git won't > handle them well. In which branch? I just checked and didn't spot any pyc or pyo files in git.