From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D43A1387B1 for ; Tue, 22 Sep 2015 06:34:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 49B0AE085C; Tue, 22 Sep 2015 06:34:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-f173.google.com (mail-wi0-f173.google.com [209.85.212.173]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C5F16E085C for ; Tue, 22 Sep 2015 06:34:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wicfx3 with SMTP id fx3so8380944wic.0 for ; Mon, 21 Sep 2015 23:34:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=xBctLNtlPtR0Qxl27FIX7GeYhgerCHcC8sHnUUIqUJI=; b=Wl6MlVV4KfClRJrQQt9Pty+2GIurdSODU5ODhBkIYk5Puw4ehs3xDBkamZw7XR9XXt r6kHGggL0cYeBTk7Sgku+o+EDVhtSnnBfroNUhxblJbXTjv1yiGzqrpefc2QNmEPmyRs Nh8WV0XR579iTZRAtz9CPcTVH6zxvGIKAWgvNpUv80TAxZAqWNDsHNVh8E5VONTueHs9 ULTN7GVdpwZ58ZkZaD39uke2qInyCKbbXVaUwZdA+Cj+tV991tUK6nHRPa1aA2H+wjoZ Xv9LiGgky8uXCqwxXq0sNcTZUr8pu54JQre8GieFEDRDVubuKT0a5ZnZ4AmSllITjPp7 kHjQ== X-Received: by 10.194.189.235 with SMTP id gl11mr18829082wjc.68.1442903671463; Mon, 21 Sep 2015 23:34:31 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-catalyst@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-catalyst@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.27.136.195 with HTTP; Mon, 21 Sep 2015 23:34:12 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20150921182147.GF7802@vapier.lan> References: <1442839128-24946-1-git-send-email-lenohou@gmail.com> <56000DEA.6050607@gentoo.org> <56003B3E.2060001@gentoo.org> <20150921182147.GF7802@vapier.lan> From: Leno Hou Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2015 14:34:12 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-catalyst][PATCH v1] arch/powerpc.py:add support for subarch power8 bug#560818 To: gentoo-catalyst@lists.gentoo.org, kevin.zhaoshuai@cn.ibm.com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bd6ba78c8652105205030ec X-Archives-Salt: e6269989-d046-45f8-9cac-831299d4fbb2 X-Archives-Hash: 5d5a658e7ca547359f46d702edfe0d82 --047d7bd6ba78c8652105205030ec Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 2:21 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On 21 Sep 2015 13:15, Anthony G. Basile wrote: > > On 9/21/15 10:02 AM, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina wrote: > > > On 09/21/2015 08:38 AM, Leno Hou wrote: > > >> + self.settings["CHOST"]="powerpc64le-linux-gnu" > > > > The CHOST is incorrect. It should powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu. Leno, > > can you please try to switch it to that and do another catalyst run. > > You can begin with your current stage3 with the above CHOST and it > > should work out correctly to the new CHOST name. In another place you > > said there is no compiler "powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu" but that makes > > no sense. The tuple is parsed by gnuconfig script and it should work > > like all other CHOST names we have in gentoo. > > powerpc64le-linux-gnu is a valid tuple (vendor can generally be omitted), > but in Gentoo we do use "unknown" for our ppc ports. so do as Anthony > says ;). > -mike > When set CHOST="powerpc64le-linux-gnu", successfully compiled stage1. But CHOST="powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu", something happens as following. https://bpaste.net/show/189b2b12d8e2 So I think CHOST="powerpc64le-linux-gnu" would be better. -Leno Hou --047d7bd6ba78c8652105205030ec Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 2:21 AM, Mik= e Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> wrote:
=
On 21 Se= p 2015 13:15, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
> On 9/21/15 10:02 AM, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina wrote:
> > On 09/21/2015 08:38 AM, Leno Hou wrote:
> >> +=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 s= elf.settings["CHOST"]=3D"powerpc64le-linux-gnu"
>
> The CHOST is incorrect.=C2=A0 It should powerp= c64le-unknown-linux-gnu. Leno,
> can you please try to switch it to that and do another catalyst run. > You can begin with your current stage3 with the above CHOST and it
> should work out correctly to the new CHOST name.=C2=A0 In another plac= e you
> said there is no compiler "powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu" bu= t that makes
> no sense.=C2=A0 The tuple is parsed by gnuconfig script and it should = work
> like all other CHOST names we have in gentoo.

powerpc64le-linux-gnu is a valid tuple (vendor can generally be omit= ted),
but in Gentoo we do use "unknown" for our ppc ports.=C2=A0 so do = as Anthony
says ;).
-mike

When = set CHOST=3D"powerpc64le-linux-gnu", successfully compiled stage1= .
But CHOST=3D"powerpc64-unknown-linux= -gnu", something happens as following.
https://bpaste.net/show/1= 89b2b12d8e2=C2=A0=C2=A0

<= div class=3D"gmail_extra">So I think CHOST=3D"powerpc64le-linux-gnu&qu= ot; would be better.=C2=A0

-Leno Hou


--047d7bd6ba78c8652105205030ec--