| 1 |
On 10/5/15 10:46 PM, Anthony G. Basile wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 10/5/15 10:36 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 3 |
>> On 05 Oct 2015 22:25, Anthony G. Basile wrote: |
| 4 |
>>> Okay time to do some cleanup. I want to nuke the catalyst_2 and |
| 5 |
>>> catalyst_3 branches. dol-sen is going to take care of pending and 3.0. |
| 6 |
>>> I have no idea what write-on-master and tar-volume-label are so my |
| 7 |
>>> feeling is to nuke those too unless someone speaks up and said, wait |
| 8 |
>>> NO! |
| 9 |
>> rather than delete branches (and thus history), how about we move |
| 10 |
>> them to |
| 11 |
>> a "old/" or "dead/" namespace ? then it'd be: |
| 12 |
>> refs/heads/ |
| 13 |
>> |-- 2.x |
| 14 |
>> |-- 3.0 |
| 15 |
>> |-- master |
| 16 |
>> `-- old |
| 17 |
>> |-- catalyst_2 |
| 18 |
>> |-- catalyst_3 |
| 19 |
>> |-- rewrite-on-master |
| 20 |
>> `-- tar-volume-label |
| 21 |
>> -mike |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> yeah even better, except i'm not sure how to do nested branches like |
| 24 |
> that. i'll google it. |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
Okay its pretty easy. I'm not going to use gitnamespaces(7) but just |
| 27 |
copy the branches to branches named old/catalyst_2 etc which will give |
| 28 |
the above structure. This will keep the history but the branches will |
| 29 |
show up as "old/catalyst_2" on gitweb.g.o under branch. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
-- |
| 32 |
Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D. |
| 33 |
Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened] |
| 34 |
E-Mail : blueness@g.o |
| 35 |
GnuPG FP : 1FED FAD9 D82C 52A5 3BAB DC79 9384 FA6E F52D 4BBA |
| 36 |
GnuPG ID : F52D4BBA |
Archives