| 1 |
Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Tuesday 05 February 2008, Derek Fedel wrote: |
| 3 |
>> Ah, silly me. I should've figured it was something along those lines, |
| 4 |
>> but I had read mention of catalyst not forcing setarch anymore in the |
| 5 |
>> ChangeLog and got confused, I guess. Thanks, and sorry for the now |
| 6 |
>> seemingly inane question. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> please fix your quoting ... top posting is the devil |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
I concur :P |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
>> On Feb 5, 2008 8:16 AM, Andrew Gaffney <agaffney@g.o> wrote: |
| 13 |
>>> Derek Fedel wrote: |
| 14 |
>>>> I know! I know! 2.0.5 isn't supposed to have this problem. Let me |
| 15 |
>>>> explain, I've got a brand new install of 2007.0, a fresh copy of |
| 16 |
>>>> portage, and this as my spec file: |
| 17 |
>>> How many times do we have to say this? :P |
| 18 |
>>> |
| 19 |
>>> If you're going to build your own CD, you also need to build your own set |
| 20 |
>>> of stages with the same snapshot. This is the *only* way to completely |
| 21 |
>>> avoid the various upgrade blockers that occur in the tree. |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> is there a catalyst/stages FAQ ? if not, there should be ... |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Are you volunteering? :) |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
Andrew Gaffney http://dev.gentoo.org/~agaffney/ |
| 29 |
Gentoo Linux Developer Catalyst/Installer + x86 release coordinator |
| 30 |
-- |
| 31 |
gentoo-catalyst@l.g.o mailing list |
Archives