| 1 |
Chris Gianelloni wrote: |
| 2 |
> I guess I just don't get why people are putting paths they know are |
| 3 |
> going to be variable in a spec file. |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
vars needed for a stage4: |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
subarch: |
| 8 |
version_stamp: |
| 9 |
snapshot: |
| 10 |
source_subpath: |
| 11 |
portage_confdir: |
| 12 |
portage_overlay: |
| 13 |
pkgcache_path: |
| 14 |
kerncache_path: |
| 15 |
stage4/fsscript: |
| 16 |
stage4/root_overlay: |
| 17 |
boot/kernel/gentoo/config: |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
with different invocations needed for: |
| 20 |
amd64 |
| 21 |
x86 |
| 22 |
devel |
| 23 |
prod |
| 24 |
servertypeA |
| 25 |
servertypeB |
| 26 |
servertypeC |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
And combinations thereof. |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
Still possible, but would make life easier if solved with relative paths |
| 31 |
in specfile instead of wrapperscripts and commandline options. |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
Regards, |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
Ramon |
| 36 |
-- |
| 37 |
gentoo-catalyst@g.o mailing list |
Archives