| 1 |
On Wed, 2005-07-06 at 14:21 +0200, Andreas Rueckert wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> Do have any clue, what package could cause the problem? My first idea was |
| 4 |
> genkernel, but masking the newer genkernel version had no effect. devfsd and |
| 5 |
> busybox are the same version in both snapshot. I tried to download snapshots |
| 6 |
> from between the 2 version (thought of doing some kinda median cut search, |
| 7 |
> but got errors, that those trees where incomplete (ARCH flag not set iirc)). |
| 8 |
> My next idea was the compiler, but it seems it compiled all packages just |
| 9 |
> fine. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
> Has anyone a strategy to find the problem? |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Not necessarily, but I do have some hints. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
#1. don't use bootsplash with a kernel > 2.6.7, as it is now gensplash. |
| 16 |
#2. drop devfsd in favor of udev |
| 17 |
#3. try using the masked versions of catalyst, we've fixed a *ton* of |
| 18 |
problems, plus it helps us resolve issues with the new version before it |
| 19 |
goes stable |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
Chris Gianelloni |
| 23 |
Release Engineering - Strategic Lead/QA Manager |
| 24 |
Games - Developer |
| 25 |
Gentoo Linux |
Archives