| 1 |
On Thu, 2008-09-04 at 04:51 +0200, Peter Stuge wrote: |
| 2 |
> Andrew Gaffney wrote: |
| 3 |
> > >I think someone else should also have noticed this too. |
| 4 |
> > |
| 5 |
> > Yes, we've noticed. However, releng doesn't build stage4 tarballs, |
| 6 |
> > so we didn't care. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> I care. Is b.g.o the right way to go? |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Yes. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
> > which we obviously don't support :) |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> Sure. It was a somewhat desperate attempt. A workaround might be to |
| 15 |
> put a hacked glibc ebuild in my overlay, but I would like to avoid |
| 16 |
> that upkeep in the long run. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Well, it needs to be fixed in the glibc ebuild, rather than catalyst. |
| 19 |
File a bug against glibc and feel free to add catalyst@g.o to the |
| 20 |
CC list, so we can watch/track the bug, also. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
Chris Gianelloni |
| 24 |
Developer |
| 25 |
wolf31o2.org |
Archives