Gentoo Archives: gentoo-catalyst

From: "Dio
To: gentoo-catalyst@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-catalyst] blocked packages com_err ss e2fsprogs during stage3
Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 19:08:08
Message-Id: 1C41B58A4BFDF94D89711390731555AB01B53809@RWMC-MAIL-C.RWMC.ORG
1 I had initially set out to create a new livecd, but ran into problems
2 with blocks involving com_err ss e2fsprogs. I then realized that
3 creating a livecd with a recent snapshot (Nov 20 2008) and the 2008.0
4 stage 3 wasn't the best way to go.
5
6 I set out to create new stage 1, 2 and 3 tarballs. I was able to create
7 the stage 1 and 2 (using the new snapshot) and am running into problems
8 attempting stage3.
9
10 Stage3 fails and below are the last few lines:
11
12 [ebuild N ] sys-libs/e2fsprogs-libs-1.41.2
13 [blocks B ] sys-libs/ss (is blocking sys-libs/e2fsprogs-libs-1.41.2)
14 [blocks B ] <sys-fs/e2fsprogs-1.41 (is blocking
15 sys-libs/e2fsprogs-libs-1.41
16 .2)
17 [blocks B ] sys-libs/com_err (is blocking
18 sys-libs/e2fsprogs-libs-1.41.2)
19 * Error: The above package list contains packages which cannot be
20 * installed at the same time on the same system.
21 !!! catalyst: run script failed.
22
23 Traceback (most recent call last):
24 File "modules/generic_stage_target.py", line 1250, in run_local
25 "run script failed.",env=self.env)
26 File "/usr/lib/catalyst/modules/catalyst_support.py", line 539, in cmd
27 raise CatalystError,myexc
28 CatalystError
29 None
30 !!! catalyst: Stage build aborting due to error.
31 !!! catalyst: Error encountered during run of target stage3
32 Catalyst aborting....
33
34 My stage 3 spec:
35 subarch: i686
36 target: stage3
37 version_stamp: rwmc.001
38 rel_type: default
39 profile: default/linux/x86/2008.0
40 snapshot: latest
41 source_subpath: default/stage2-i686-rwmc.001
42
43 I would appreciate any guidance as to how I can resolve these blocks
44 (which issues for this appear to be tracked in 234907 but make no
45 mention to catalyst.) I had thought that creating new stage 1 and 2 with
46 new snapshot may resolve this, but apparently I am off on that
47 assumption.
48
49 Thanks,
50 Jim

Replies