| 1 |
On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 2:21 PM, Sebastian Pipping <sping@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> Hello! |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> The current process of copying changes from 2.x to 3.x or vice versa is |
| 6 |
> suboptimal, especially with no recent merge commit around. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> I would like to start this thread to list and discuss differences |
| 9 |
> between catalyst 2.x and 3.x so we can then decide what needs to be |
| 10 |
> merged in which direction and then have a single branch soon (ideally) |
| 11 |
> or at least two branches with clear and to-the-point diffs. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> Difference I have noticed (without searching) so far: |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> - Subarch "sh4aeb" is not supported on 3.x but 2.x |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> - Folder ./arch of 2.x is ./modules/catalyst/arch in 3.x |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> Please add any differences you are aware of. Many thanks! |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
As an aside, patches should go into master first, and cherry-picked |
| 22 |
back to catalyst_2, not the other way around. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Matt |
Archives