| 1 |
le Tue, 05 Jun 2007 09:03:00 -0500 |
| 2 |
Andrew Gaffney <agaffney@g.o> a écrit: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> Luca Casagrande wrote: |
| 5 |
> > |
| 6 |
> > Il giorno 01/giu/07, alle ore 17:52, Isidore Ducasse ha scritto: |
| 7 |
> > |
| 8 |
> >>> |
| 9 |
> >>> We used genkernel-3.4.8 and gentoo-sources-2.6.19-r5 for the release. |
| 10 |
> >> |
| 11 |
> >> As far as I know, unionfs doesn't work for >2.6.20 kernels. At least |
| 12 |
> >> not portage's ones. |
| 13 |
> >> aufs on the sunrise overlay seems a very interesting alternative. Does |
| 14 |
> >> someone know if there are plans to integrate it into standard portage |
| 15 |
> >> tree? |
| 16 |
> >> |
| 17 |
> > |
| 18 |
> > Have you tested it with 2.6.19-r5 ? |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> It was apparently working with early builds of the 2007.0 release using that |
| 21 |
> kernel, but "something" happened, and it no longer works in the official release |
| 22 |
> media. We haven't investigated it yet, since it wasn't an advertised feature. |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> -- |
| 25 |
Is there any chance gentoo-livecd will ever use an alternative union-filesystem as aufs? It does compile and work fine with later kernels (I use it with a 2.6.20-gentoo-r8 kernel under amd64). |
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
gentoo-catalyst@g.o mailing list |
Archives