| 1 |
Charles Duffy wrote: |
| 2 |
> Andrew Gaffney wrote: |
| 3 |
>> The proper solution is probably to provide some sort of mapping in |
| 4 |
>> catalyst for portage -> kernel arch names. However, it's likely that |
| 5 |
>> this already exists in the code. The netboot2 code just needs to utilize |
| 6 |
>> this mapping when it is copying those files. |
| 7 |
>> |
| 8 |
>> Please file a bug for this, and I'll take a look when I get a chance. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> Filed as #181095 [http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181095] |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
I've attached to the bug a proposed patch which allows individual |
| 14 |
architectures, when registering themselves, to optionally provide the |
| 15 |
name to use in connection with genkernel. This is then passed to the |
| 16 |
shell scripts doing the lifting as clst_hostkarch (which defaults to the |
| 17 |
regular hostarch value if a kernel architecture name is not specified). |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
The implementation could maybe a little prettier, but it WORKSFORME. |
| 20 |
Comments? http://bugs.gentoo.org/attachment.cgi?id=121523&action=view |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
gentoo-catalyst@g.o mailing list |
Archives