| 1 |
On Fri, 2007-03-16 at 12:29 +0100, Åsmund Grammeltvedt wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Friday 16 March 2007 12:24, Andrew Gaffney wrote: |
| 3 |
> > Åsmund Grammeltvedt wrote: |
| 4 |
> > > Hi. |
| 5 |
> > > |
| 6 |
> > > Is portage_overlay supposed to do something useful for grp targets? The |
| 7 |
> > > combination of generic_stage_target.py:907, which forces PORTDIR_OVERLAY |
| 8 |
> > > to /usr/local/portage, and "portage_overlay" missing in |
| 9 |
> > > grp_target.py:112's action_sequence, means that the overlay won't be |
| 10 |
> > > where portage looks for it. Not having overlays available for the GRP |
| 11 |
> > > target seems somewhat impractical. |
| 12 |
> > |
| 13 |
> > So file a bug. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> I'm going to, but I wanted to sanity check first. That's what the question |
| 16 |
> mark's there for. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
It should be available/usable, yes. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
Chris Gianelloni |
| 22 |
Release Engineering Strategic Lead |
| 23 |
Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams |
| 24 |
Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee |
| 25 |
Gentoo Foundation |
Archives