1 |
On Thu, 2004-12-30 at 11:31 -0500, John Davis wrote: |
2 |
> On Thu, 2004-12-30 at 11:11 -0500, John Davis wrote: |
3 |
> > On Wed, 2004-12-29 at 10:03 -0500, Chris Gianelloni wrote: |
4 |
> > > On Wed, 2004-12-29 at 10:29 +1300, Jerome Brown wrote: |
5 |
> > > > William Kilian wrote: |
6 |
> > > > |
7 |
> > > > > Apparently portage_confdir cannot be a symlink. I was using a symlink to |
8 |
> > > > > my /etc/portage directory. When I renamed the symlink and cp -a |
9 |
> > > > > /etc/portage where-symlink-was, then the contents of the files started |
10 |
> > > > > to matter. If there is an argument that portage_confdir shouldn't be a |
11 |
> > > > > symlink, my response is that building multiple targets using identical |
12 |
> > > > > configuration info but different (sub)archs is a strong use-case |
13 |
> > > > > justifying a symlink. |
14 |
> > > > > |
15 |
> > > > |
16 |
> > > > Wouldn't using a hard link instead work? (ln /etc/portage/ |
17 |
> > > > /my/build/root/etc/portage) |
18 |
> > > |
19 |
> > > You should never use a hard link on a directory. A bind mount would be |
20 |
> > > the preferred method of doing this. |
21 |
> > > |
22 |
> > |
23 |
> > A bind mount might be the best way to go about this anyway. I will |
24 |
> > update the code in CVS. |
25 |
> > |
26 |
> > Cheers, |
27 |
> > //John |
28 |
> |
29 |
> Will, I opened a bug for this request: |
30 |
> |
31 |
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76146 |
32 |
> |
33 |
> Add yourself to the CC list, and keep an eye out for a patch. Once the |
34 |
> patch is tested and works, I will add it into CVS. |
35 |
> |
36 |
> Cheers, |
37 |
|
38 |
OK, patch added to the bug - let me know what happens! |
39 |
|
40 |
Cheers, |
41 |
-- |
42 |
John Davis <zhen@g.o> |
43 |
The Gentoo Foundation |
44 |
Trustee | Release Engineering Manager | Catalyst code monkey |
45 |
|
46 |
--- |
47 |
"When people learn no tools of judgement and merely follow their hopes, |
48 |
the seeds of political manipulation are sown" |
49 |
- Stephen Jay Gould |