| 1 |
W. Trevor King wrote: |
| 2 |
> > It's not a bad idea, but OTOH copying /etc/localtime and just |
| 3 |
> > removing it again needs no new parameter and would be quite a |
| 4 |
> > simple patch. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> But then why not just copy over the portage tree too, instead of |
| 7 |
> going through the snapshot procedure? |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
As it happens, I have a patch which implements that. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
> I think the point of catalyst is to isolate the final tarballs/ISOs |
| 13 |
> from the host system used to build them. Otherwise we could skip |
| 14 |
> stages and catalyst, building the tarballs in a simple chroot. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Yes and no. For timezone and resolv.conf that doesn't make sense. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
//Peter |
Archives