| 1 |
On Friday 29 July 2005 10:53, Chris Gianelloni wrote: |
| 2 |
> Except unionsfs does not support being remounted ro... period... |
| 3 |
remounting /memory ro. Not unionfs |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
> Well, it looks like we're going to have to remove the unionfs support |
| 6 |
> from genkernel, simply because it is not ready for use and now we're |
| 7 |
> already having people filing bugs on it to make it work how they want it |
| 8 |
> when it isn't fully implemented yet. Basically, we're receiving too |
| 9 |
> much noise on it. |
| 10 |
What a pity :( |
| 11 |
Don't consider my comments a bug report. I am offering to implement something |
| 12 |
and would like to know if it is desirable. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Rafael |
Archives