Gentoo Archives: gentoo-catalyst

From: Andrew Gaffney <agaffney@g.o>
To: gentoo-catalyst@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-catalyst] Stage1 app-arch/lzma-utils-4.32.7 fails
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 11:07:04
Message-Id: 4A98027C.10303@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-catalyst] Stage1 app-arch/lzma-utils-4.32.7 fails by "Andreas Rückert"
1 On 08/28/2009 03:17 AM, "Andreas Rückert" wrote:
2 > Hi!
3 >
4 > -------- Original-Nachricht --------
5 >> Datum: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 00:07:04 +0200
6 >> Von: Michael Zanetta<grimmlin@××××××.ch>
7 >> An: gentoo-catalyst@l.g.o
8 >> Betreff: Re: [gentoo-catalyst] Stage1 app-arch/lzma-utils-4.32.7 fails
9 >
10 >> Well, that might not solve your blockers anyway...
11 >>
12 >> You can eventually remove all the binary packages, remove the
13 >> autoresume point and try to rebuild the stage1.
14 >
15 > Thanks a lot for your hint! That solved some of my problems.
16 >
17 > I did as you proposed, then ran stage1-3, livecd-stage1 and now
18 > I'm stuck at livecd-stage2.
19 >
20 > world has util-linux-2.16, genkernel requires e2fsprogs and e2fsprogs
21 > blocks util-linux-2.16 .
22 >
23 > I could try to remove util-linux from my stage3 source before building
24 > stage1-3 (already did that with man-pages-2.x, which was blocking
25 > man-pages-3), but I'm not sure yet, if util-linux is actually required
26 > by something.
27 >
28 > But then I wonder why genkernel depends on e2fsprogs? I could create
29 > a livecd without a ext2 filesystem, right? (using other fs types).
30 > genkernel could have a use-flag for e2fs then, or so.
31 >
32 > Or did I miss something?
33
34 It sounds like you're using mismatched snapshots and/or stage seeds.
35
36 --
37 Andrew Gaffney http://dev.gentoo.org/~agaffney/
38 Gentoo Linux Developer Catalyst/Genkernel + Release Engineering Lead

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-catalyst] Stage1 app-arch/lzma-utils-4.32.7 fails "Andreas Rückert" <a_rueckert@×××.net>