| 1 |
On Fri, 2005-04-22 at 11:45 +0000, Kosta Todorovic wrote: |
| 2 |
> Pardon the attachments! |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> How would i unmask libstdc++-v3? Im not quite sure what you mean? ~x86? |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/handbook/handbook-x86.xml?part=3&chap=3 |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
My suggestion is to unmask the package in your portage tree, then |
| 9 |
re-snapshot. You could also create an overlay with the package |
| 10 |
unmasked, then re-snapshot with the overlay, if you're not comfortable |
| 11 |
editing your live portage tree. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
> On 4/22/05, Chris Gianelloni <wolf31o2@g.o> wrote: |
| 14 |
> > On Fri, 2005-04-22 at 10:47 +0000, Kosta Todorovic wrote: |
| 15 |
> > > I've tried to add NMAP to the livecd using catalyst but when I try and |
| 16 |
> > > run it it gives the following error: |
| 17 |
> > > nmap: error while loading shared libraries: libstdc++.so.5: cannot |
| 18 |
> > > open shared object file: No such file or directory |
| 19 |
> > |
| 20 |
> > Either do not unmerge gcc, or unmask libstdc++-v3 and emerge it during |
| 21 |
> > livecd-stage1. |
| 22 |
> > |
| 23 |
> > Normally, we don't need to see your spec files. You save traffic on the |
| 24 |
> > mailing list by not attaching them until they're requested. I know that |
| 25 |
> > this is different than in bug reports, where we want as much information |
| 26 |
> > as possible, but mailing lists reach many more users and we still have a |
| 27 |
> > large number of users (and devs) on dial-up. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
-- |
| 30 |
Chris Gianelloni |
| 31 |
Release Engineering - Strategic Lead/QA Manager |
| 32 |
Games - Developer |
| 33 |
Gentoo Linux |
Archives