| 1 |
On Tue, 2013-02-26 at 19:22 -0800, Matt Turner wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> So from talking on IRC, it seems that the problem that led to this |
| 4 |
> patch was that a binpkg of gcc linked against an old mpc was used |
| 5 |
> during stage1, leading to a broken gcc in stage2. Stripping --usepkg |
| 6 |
> makes sense for this purpose. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> Removing --buildpkg I'm not sure about. It seems to me that anything |
| 9 |
> that is built during the seed-update should be okay to use for the |
| 10 |
> stage1. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Yeah, I thought it should be ok too, but so far opted to leave it out |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
I thought I'd wait for more feedback. That's also why I cc'd Zac, since |
| 16 |
I didn't know if he was on this list. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
> Adding an option for updating @system still seems unnecessary. |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
If everyone wants it nuked, is easy todo :) |
Archives