From: | "W. Trevor King" <wking@×××××××.us> |
---|---|
To: | Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o> |
Cc: | Matt Turner <mattst88@g.o>, gentoo-catalyst@l.g.o, Brian Dolbec <dolsen@g.o> |
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-catalyst] [PATCH 0/2] Blacklisting binary packages |
Date: | Tue, 16 Apr 2013 22:53:37 |
Message-Id: | 20130416225317.GD13055@odin.tremily.us |
1 | On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 03:28:04PM -0700, Zac Medico wrote: |
2 | > If you can't get the people maintaining the ebuilds in gentoo-x86 to |
3 | > cooperate with migration to EAPI 5, then I think your best option is |
4 | > to start an eapi-5 overlay which contains EAPI 5 ports of those |
5 | > ebuilds. |
6 | |
7 | Good idea. I'll look into that after I hit a wall on sub-slotting |
8 | udev [1]. |
9 | |
10 | Cheers, |
11 | Trevor |
12 | |
13 | [1]: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=466162 |
14 | |
15 | -- |
16 | This email may be signed or encrypted with GnuPG (http://www.gnupg.org). |
17 | For more information, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pretty_Good_Privacy |
File name | MIME type |
---|---|
signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-catalyst] [PATCH 0/2] Blacklisting binary packages | Brian Dolbec <dolsen@g.o> |