Gentoo Archives: gentoo-catalyst

From: "W. Trevor King" <wking@×××××××.us>
To: Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o>
Cc: Matt Turner <mattst88@g.o>, gentoo-catalyst@l.g.o, Brian Dolbec <dolsen@g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-catalyst] [PATCH 0/2] Blacklisting binary packages
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2013 22:53:37
Message-Id: 20130416225317.GD13055@odin.tremily.us
1 On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 03:28:04PM -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
2 > If you can't get the people maintaining the ebuilds in gentoo-x86 to
3 > cooperate with migration to EAPI 5, then I think your best option is
4 > to start an eapi-5 overlay which contains EAPI 5 ports of those
5 > ebuilds.
6
7 Good idea. I'll look into that after I hit a wall on sub-slotting
8 udev [1].
9
10 Cheers,
11 Trevor
12
13 [1]: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=466162
14
15 --
16 This email may be signed or encrypted with GnuPG (http://www.gnupg.org).
17 For more information, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pretty_Good_Privacy

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-catalyst] [PATCH 0/2] Blacklisting binary packages Brian Dolbec <dolsen@g.o>