From: | Andrew Savchenko <bircoph@×××××.com> |
---|---|
To: | gentoo-cluster@l.g.o |
Subject: | [gentoo-cluster] OrangeFS |
Date: | Sun, 01 Jul 2012 18:09:34 |
Message-Id: | 20120701212459.164096fb.bircoph@gmail.com |
1 | Hello, |
2 | |
3 | we're using orangefs as a distributed parallel file system in our |
4 | cluster. I opened a bug for it some time ago: |
5 | https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=411173 |
6 | |
7 | ATM some file there are outdated and it is better to use orangefs |
8 | from my overlay (sorry, I can't update files in the bug for each |
9 | little change): |
10 | http://git.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=user/bircoph.git;a=tree;f=sys-cluster/orangefs;h=c5c01fdc40c03cbb01c1702a6732d79f087403ab;hb=HEAD |
11 | |
12 | This filesystem has its problems, mostly with recent kernels in its |
13 | kernel interface. But alternative fuse client is available and works |
14 | really good for our tasks. |
15 | |
16 | If someone can proxy-maintain this package for me, I can support it |
17 | for the benefit of all Gentoo community. |
18 | |
19 | P.S. OrangeFS-2.8.6 was recently released, I'll work on it in a while, |
20 | but ATM cluster is in production and I can't stop it for an upgrade |
21 | and testing. Hopefully 2.8.6 will fix kernel issues we have, so we'll |
22 | be able to get rid of fuse. |
23 | |
24 | Best regards, |
25 | Andrew Savchenko |