Gentoo Archives: gentoo-cluster

From: Larry Lines <larry@××××××××××.com>
To: gentoo-cluster@l.g.o, gentoo-cluster@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-cluster] Like Isilon?
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2005 05:29:01
Message-Id: 20050718052538.1538.qmail@hosting333.com
1 Not sure what you are trying to accomplish, but it seems like a parallel file system like pvfs2 or lustre might be what you are looking for.
2
3 Larry Lines
4
5 -------Original Message-------
6 > From: David Busby <busby@××××××.com>
7 > Subject: [gentoo-cluster] Like Isilon?
8 > Sent: 18 Jul '05 01:56
9 >
10 > I'm certian you all know about Isilon, which effectively makes a big huge data location from many dedicated devices. I
11 > want to do that too, but on Gentoo. My vision of the system is like such:
12 >
13 > [ 100Mbit Ethernet Corp. Network ]
14 > |
15 > |
16 > [ 2 front end clustered/HA servers ]
17 > This is what the other network hosts will see, I would like have availablility to these servers via netatalk and
18 > samba. I'd make those to boxes to have the same IP with the load balancer in netfilter. They would serve data from the
19 > storage cluster behind them.
20 > |
21 > |
22 > [ Gig/Fiber ]
23 > |
24 > |
25 > [ n+ backend storage servers. ]
26 > These would be big disk boxes, you know SCSI+RAID5 in the hardware lots of storage space.
27 > These would run Gentoo as well and then I can add/remove nodes in this storage cluster witout down time or data loss.
28 >
29 > I'm looking at evms vs gfs. Seems like GFS is closer to what I want than evms, but I don't know.
30 > Also, what about when I buy iSCSI devices or some of those other fancy SAN devices, how can I plug those into the data
31 > servers cluster to use their storage, what package to use?
32 >
33 > /djb
34 >
35 > --
36 > gentoo-cluster@g.o mailing list
37 >
38 >
39 -------Original Message-------
40 --
41 gentoo-cluster@g.o mailing list