| 1 |
+1, |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
I would like to make fortran.eclass more generic because we use |
| 4 |
Pathscale fortran here (SiCortex). |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
I'll see what I can do about pushing Pathscale to donate some sort of |
| 7 |
solution that Gentoo QA could use. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
-- |
| 10 |
Joel Martin (kanaka) |
| 11 |
Open Source |
| 12 |
no BILL . no GATES |
| 13 |
Costs nothing . Open to all |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Donnie Berkholz wrote: [Wed Dec 13 2006, 03:06:56AM EST] |
| 16 |
> Adam Carheden wrote: |
| 17 |
> >I HAVE the ebuild for PGI (5.2, 6.0, 6.2.3, 6.2.5), but I'm not buying |
| 18 |
> >Gentoo a license. |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> If we can't install it, we can't run any meaningful QA on the ebuild or |
| 21 |
> support it. So that needs to happen for it to get in the tree. The other |
| 22 |
> solution I suggested is the better one anyway, because it'll also work |
| 23 |
> for Pathscale, etc. |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> Thanks, |
| 26 |
> Donnie |
| 27 |
> -- |
| 28 |
> gentoo-cluster@g.o mailing list |
Archives