| 1 |
Andrew D. Fant wrote: |
| 2 |
> Donnie Berkholz wrote: |
| 3 |
>> We might benefit from splitting the clustering packages into two |
| 4 |
>> separate groups for high-availability and high-performance computing. |
| 5 |
>> This will help to keep the bugs a bit cleaner so each group of folks |
| 6 |
>> will have a clearer idea of what they need to do. |
| 7 |
>> |
| 8 |
>> Does anyone else have thoughts on this? |
| 9 |
>> |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> It sounds like a good idea. Are there enough developers who would want to go |
| 12 |
> with either herd to make it viable? |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Here's the cluster alias: |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
azarah |
| 17 |
ct |
| 18 |
george |
| 19 |
dberkholz |
| 20 |
pyrania |
| 21 |
voxus |
| 22 |
iggy |
| 23 |
xmerlin |
| 24 |
markusle |
| 25 |
ribosome |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
Of those, I haven't seen azarah, ct, george, pyrania or iggy do anything |
| 28 |
lately. |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
ha: xmerlin |
| 31 |
hpc: dberkholz, voxus, xmerlin, markusle, ribosome |
| 32 |
tantive also has metadata for much of the openmosix stuff. |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
This pretty clearly shows that we could use extra help for HA packages. |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
Thanks, |
| 37 |
Donnie |
| 38 |
-- |
| 39 |
gentoo-cluster@g.o mailing list |
Archives