Gentoo Archives: gentoo-commits

From: "Andreas HAttel (dilfridge)" <dilfridge@g.o>
To: gentoo-commits@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-commits] gentoo commit in xml/htdocs/proj/en/desktop/kde/meeting-logs: kde-project-meeting-summary-20120621.txt
Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2012 21:58:41
Message-Id: 20120630215821.CBBB02004C@flycatcher.gentoo.org
1 dilfridge 12/06/30 21:58:21
2
3 Added: kde-project-meeting-summary-20120621.txt
4 Log:
5 Add meeting summary
6
7 Revision Changes Path
8 1.1 xml/htdocs/proj/en/desktop/kde/meeting-logs/kde-project-meeting-summary-20120621.txt
9
10 file : http://sources.gentoo.org/viewvc.cgi/gentoo/xml/htdocs/proj/en/desktop/kde/meeting-logs/kde-project-meeting-summary-20120621.txt?rev=1.1&view=markup
11 plain: http://sources.gentoo.org/viewvc.cgi/gentoo/xml/htdocs/proj/en/desktop/kde/meeting-logs/kde-project-meeting-summary-20120621.txt?rev=1.1&content-type=text/plain
12
13 Index: kde-project-meeting-summary-20120621.txt
14 ===================================================================
15 1. Roll call (4 minutes, 5 minutes planned)
16 Present: alexxy, dilfridge, scarabeus, tampakrap
17
18 2. Move KDE 4.8.4 to the tree, and in which variant? (1 minute, 5 minutes planned)
19 It seems that the problems have been solved with a) newer soprano or b) reverted commit.
20 Which way do we want to go?
21 All in favour of reverting the commit in kdelibs and pushing 4.8.4 to the tree to work
22 with "old" soprano.
23
24 3. Once it's out, should we move KDE 4.9.0 to the tree? (3 minutes, 10 minutes planned)
25 Currently 4.8.90 looks quite solid, so this is a real option.
26 All in favour of adding 4.9.0 to the main tree as ~arch
27
28 4. Udisks2 (8 minutes, 5 minutes planned)
29 On request from Samuli I've added the Udisks2 patch from RedHat to kdelibs. This
30 *replaces* the udisks:0 solid backend with a new udisks:2 version. Has according
31 to Wulf (Philantrop) still some issues.
32 Feedback? Experiences? Keep for 4.9.0 or (temporarily) ditch again?
33 No decision, some discussion with alexxy and Philantrop about the problem. We'll keep
34 watching Fedora's code and talk to the Fedora maintainers.
35
36 5. Bugs (1 minute, 30 minutes planned)
37 * app-cdr/k3b: Excessive use of REQUIRED_USE (and wrong combination USE="lame"+"encode")
38 REQUIRED_USE was added, otherwise USE="-encode lame" does nothing
39 Options:
40 1. Revert to original behaviour - we don't care that USE="-encode lame" does nothing
41 2. Keep the REQUIRED_USE, but rename lame -> mp3
42 3. Drop the encode flag, but move the optional RDEPS to an elog
43 4. Drop the encode flag and keep optional RDEPS (current behaviour)
44 https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=417235
45 Postponed since the principal actors involved were absent.
46
47 6. Open floor (10 minutes, 15 minutes planned)
48 tampakrap asks for more speakers and workshop organizers at the Gentoo miniconf October in
49 Prague. Some ideas are thrown around, nothing definite yet.
50
51 [21:34:02] <dilfridge> meeting closed
52 [21:34:13] <dilfridge> i think we just made a new speed recoed
53 [21:34:19] <dilfridge> :)