[gentoo-commits] proj/gcc-patches:master commit in: 12.2.0/musl/nocross/

[Sam James]

commit:     4ec26d74c881c1fb4fd0c49aa9162ad56d5d0138
Author:     Sam James <sam <AT> gentoo <DOT> org>
AuthorDate: Sun Jan 29 08:53:24 2023 +0000
Commit:     Sam James <sam <AT> gentoo <DOT> org>
CommitDate: Sun Jan 29 08:53:35 2023 +0000
URL:        https://gitweb.gentoo.org/proj/gcc-patches.git/commit/?id=4ec26d74

12.2.0: delete old stale nocross patch

Fixes: 6cbc18ad615fd39e765d114db4ed13d801e79f14
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam <AT> gentoo.org>

 .../nocross/50_all_libssp_unconditionally.patch    | 24 ----------------------
 1 file changed, 24 deletions(-)

diff --git a/12.2.0/musl/nocross/50_all_libssp_unconditionally.patch b/12.2.0/musl/nocross/50_all_libssp_unconditionally.patch
deleted file mode 100644
index a3b5984..0000000
--- a/12.2.0/musl/nocross/50_all_libssp_unconditionally.patch
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,24 +0,0 @@
-https://bugs.gentoo.org/706210
-https://bugs.gentoo.org/747346
-
-Author: Timo Teräs <timo.teras@×××.fi>
-
-"Alpine musl package provides libssp_nonshared.a. We link to it unconditionally,
-as otherwise we get link failures if some objects are -fstack-protector built
-and final link happens with -fno-stack-protector. This seems to be the common
-case when bootstrapping gcc, the piepatches do not seem to fully fix the
-crosstoolchain and  bootstrap sequence wrt. stack-protector flag usage."
-
-(We do the same in Gentoo.)
---- a/gcc/gcc.cc
-+++ b/gcc/gcc.cc
-@@ -870,8 +870,7 @@
- 
- #ifndef LINK_SSP_SPEC
- #ifdef TARGET_LIBC_PROVIDES_SSP
--#define LINK_SSP_SPEC "%{fstack-protector|fstack-protector-all" \
--		       "|fstack-protector-strong|fstack-protector-explicit:}"
-+#define LINK_SSP_SPEC "-lssp_nonshared"
- #else
- #define LINK_SSP_SPEC "%{fstack-protector|fstack-protector-all" \
- 		       "|fstack-protector-strong|fstack-protector-explicit" \