Gentoo Archives: gentoo-commits

From: "Jeroen Roovers (jer)" <jer@g.o>
To: gentoo-commits@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-commits] gentoo commit in xml/htdocs/proj/en/qa/bug-wranglers: index.xml
Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2008 16:24:12
Message-Id: E1KcjX7-0008Ia-GN@stork.gentoo.org
1 jer 08/09/08 16:24:09
2
3 Modified: index.xml
4 Log:
5 Clarify KEYWORDREQ. Explain more about eclass bug assignment. Stress atom description in Summary.
6
7 Revision Changes Path
8 1.8 xml/htdocs/proj/en/qa/bug-wranglers/index.xml
9
10 file : http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo/xml/htdocs/proj/en/qa/bug-wranglers/index.xml?rev=1.8&view=markup
11 plain: http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo/xml/htdocs/proj/en/qa/bug-wranglers/index.xml?rev=1.8&content-type=text/plain
12 diff : http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo/xml/htdocs/proj/en/qa/bug-wranglers/index.xml?r1=1.7&r2=1.8
13
14 Index: index.xml
15 ===================================================================
16 RCS file: /var/cvsroot/gentoo/xml/htdocs/proj/en/qa/bug-wranglers/index.xml,v
17 retrieving revision 1.7
18 retrieving revision 1.8
19 diff -u -r1.7 -r1.8
20 --- index.xml 2 Sep 2008 20:35:44 -0000 1.7
21 +++ index.xml 8 Sep 2008 16:24:08 -0000 1.8
22 @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
23 <project>
24 <name>Bug Wranglers</name>
25 <longname>The Bug Wranglers Project</longname>
26 -<date>2008-09-02</date>
27 +<date>2008-09-08</date>
28 <author title="Author">
29 <mail link="jer" />
30 </author>
31 @@ -80,8 +80,11 @@
32 with a more exact description, noting the ebuild phase that failed or, better
33 yet, the first error message that occured.</li>
34 <li>Bug reports that refer to a single or a few (similar) packages should
35 -detail the package atom as completely as possible in the <c>Summary</c>. Bug reports
36 -about eclasses should list the full eclass filename.</li>
37 +detail the <b>package atom(s)</b> as completely as possible in the
38 +<c>Summary</c>, including a version only when other versions do not exhibit the
39 +bug.</li>
40 +<li>Bug reports about <b>eclasses</b> should list the full eclass filename in the
41 +<c>Summary</c>.</li>
42 </ul>
43 </body>
44 </section>
45 @@ -123,11 +126,16 @@
46 <li>Bug reports that concern <b>eclasses</b> should be assigned to the eclass
47 maintainer. To figure out who maintains an eclass, browse to the
48 <uri link="http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/eclass">gentoo-x86/eclass</uri>
49 -directory, open the file and read who maintains the eclass at the top of the file.</li>
50 -<li>A <b>keyword request</b> should be assigned to the package's maintainer and CC'd
51 -to the appropriate arch team(s).</li>
52 +directory, open the file and read who maintains the eclass at the top of the
53 +file. When an eclass file does not list maintainers, the bug report should
54 +note this omission and the last committer to that file should be made the
55 +report's assignee.</li>
56 +<li>A <b>keyword request</b> should be assigned to the package's maintainer and
57 +CC'd to the appropriate arch team(s). The report's <c>Keywords</c> field should
58 +contain the <c>KEYWORDREQ</c> keyword.</li>
59 <li>A <b>stabilisation request</b> should be handled by the package's maintainer, so
60 -you should not CC arches in your role as bug wrangler.</li>
61 +you should not CC arch teams in your role as bug wrangler, nor set the
62 +<c>STABLEREQ</c> keyword in the <c>Keywords</c> field.</li>
63 <li>Bug reports that relate to issues other than the portage tree, like
64 problems with Gentoo's bugzilla, Gentoo infrastructure, mirrors or staffing
65 matters (devrel, userrel and so on) are usually easier to assign. The <c>Product</c>