| 1 |
a3li 09/12/02 18:15:56 |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
Modified: glsa-200912-01.xml |
| 4 |
Log: |
| 5 |
Fix typo |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
Revision Changes Path |
| 8 |
1.2 xml/htdocs/security/en/glsa/glsa-200912-01.xml |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
file : http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo/xml/htdocs/security/en/glsa/glsa-200912-01.xml?rev=1.2&view=markup |
| 11 |
plain: http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo/xml/htdocs/security/en/glsa/glsa-200912-01.xml?rev=1.2&content-type=text/plain |
| 12 |
diff : http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo/xml/htdocs/security/en/glsa/glsa-200912-01.xml?r1=1.1&r2=1.2 |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Index: glsa-200912-01.xml |
| 15 |
=================================================================== |
| 16 |
RCS file: /var/cvsroot/gentoo/xml/htdocs/security/en/glsa/glsa-200912-01.xml,v |
| 17 |
retrieving revision 1.1 |
| 18 |
retrieving revision 1.2 |
| 19 |
diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 |
| 20 |
--- glsa-200912-01.xml 1 Dec 2009 21:31:25 -0000 1.1 |
| 21 |
+++ glsa-200912-01.xml 2 Dec 2009 18:15:56 -0000 1.2 |
| 22 |
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ |
| 23 |
</synopsis> |
| 24 |
<product type="ebuild">openssl</product> |
| 25 |
<announced>December 01, 2009</announced> |
| 26 |
- <revised>December 01, 2009: 01</revised> |
| 27 |
+ <revised>December 02, 2009: 02</revised> |
| 28 |
<bug>270305</bug> |
| 29 |
<bug>280591</bug> |
| 30 |
<bug>292022</bug> |
| 31 |
@@ -38,19 +38,18 @@ |
| 32 |
<li>Marsh Ray of PhoneFactor and Martin Rex of SAP independently |
| 33 |
reported that the TLS protocol does not properly handle session |
| 34 |
renegotiation requests (CVE-2009-3555).</li> |
| 35 |
- <li>The MD2 hash algorithm |
| 36 |
- is no longer considered to be cryptographically strong, as demonstrated |
| 37 |
- by Dan Kaminsky. Certificates using this algorithm are no longer |
| 38 |
- accepted (CVE-2009-2409).</li> |
| 39 |
- <li>Daniel Mentz and Robin Seggelmann |
| 40 |
- reported the following vulnerabilities related to DTLS: A |
| 41 |
- use-after-free flaw (CVE-2009-1379) and a NULL pointer dereference |
| 42 |
- (CVE-2009-1387) in the dtls1_retrieve_buffered_fragment() function in |
| 43 |
- src/d1_both.c, multiple memory leaks in the |
| 44 |
- dtls1_process_out_of_seq_message() function in src/d1_both.c |
| 45 |
- (CVE-2009-1378), and a processing error related to a large amount of |
| 46 |
- DTLS records with a future epoch in the dtls1_buffer_record() function |
| 47 |
- in ssl/d1_pkt.c (CVE-2009-1377).</li> |
| 48 |
+ <li>The MD2 hash algorithm is no longer considered to be |
| 49 |
+ cryptographically strong, as demonstrated by Dan Kaminsky. Certificates |
| 50 |
+ using this algorithm are no longer accepted (CVE-2009-2409).</li> |
| 51 |
+ <li>Daniel Mentz and Robin Seggelmann reported the following |
| 52 |
+ vulnerabilities related to DTLS: A use-after-free flaw (CVE-2009-1379) |
| 53 |
+ and a NULL pointer dereference (CVE-2009-1387) in the |
| 54 |
+ dtls1_retrieve_buffered_fragment() function in src/d1_both.c, multiple |
| 55 |
+ memory leaks in the dtls1_process_out_of_seq_message() function in |
| 56 |
+ src/d1_both.c (CVE-2009-1378), and a processing error related to a |
| 57 |
+ large amount of DTLS records with a future epoch in the |
| 58 |
+ dtls1_buffer_record() function in ssl/d1_pkt.c |
| 59 |
+ (CVE-2009-1377).</li> |
| 60 |
</ul> |
| 61 |
</description> |
| 62 |
<impact type="normal"> |
| 63 |
@@ -60,7 +59,7 @@ |
| 64 |
ability to send requests as if authenticated as the victim. A remote |
| 65 |
attacker could furthermore send specially crafted DTLS packages to a |
| 66 |
service using OpenSSL for DTLS support, possibly resulting in a Denial |
| 67 |
- of Service. Also, a remote attacker might be able to create rouge |
| 68 |
+ of Service. Also, a remote attacker might be able to create rogue |
| 69 |
certificates, facilitated by a MD2 collision. NOTE: The amount of |
| 70 |
computation needed for this attack is still very large. |
| 71 |
</p> |
Archives